Looks good, maybe i buy this game depending of the reviews of the game.

Here are some of my thoughts.

1) Miyamoto doesn't like trophies apparently, well he also didn't care for online material when making the Wii and look where that got them. I really do not care if Miyamoto agrees with trophies or online play, HIS CUSTOMERS DO CARE, make it happen. We love your game design and franchises, don't make us miss out on them because of your silly beliefs! I STILL to this day would ABSOLUTELY LOVE to play 4 on 4 wii bowling against another team online. That would be so awesome.

2) A trophy popping ruins the 'game immersion'? I find that silly, it is a tiny little thing that happens, do you also turn off your phones, people in the house, animals, and everything else? C'mon. Either way, easy fix, make them shut-offable.

3) If people do NOT like trophies, pay no mind to them. This way both groups get their way, voila!

4) I have 100%'ed most of the Wii material, however, there are a few I haven't 100%'ed. Super Mario Galaxy 1 I only have like, 60 stars on Luigi, I would have finished if there was a trophy. In Super Mario Galaxy 2 I never finished the final level without taking a damage, probably would have if there was a trophy.

5) How awesome would it be to play A Link to the Past, or Final Fantasy 3 with trophies?

Just please, nintendo, listen to the fans a bit more this time around, take a gander around you at what is working for your competition. If Miyamoto doesn't like 'online play' maybe it is because he is archaic and doesn't understand the younger audience and social networking.

I am 30, and I would love a trophy system implemented in the new Wii U.

Awesome ideas. Well done!

It was confirmed that the Wii U is more powerful than the Xbox 360 and PS3, for me that's more than enough. But you're right, the console has to be sufficiently powerful to have good multiplatform games, but if the device is only slightly more powerful than the older generation, I am pleased that the Wii U is like the Gamecube and Nintendo 64. Many good first party titles and the occasional good third party titles. Hope it is not like the Wii, a few good titles of the first party and third party, and all that casual crap.

Why we are going to need a classic controller if the Wii U controller have all the neccesary things that the Gamecube controller needs? I'm fine with the controller to play virtual console games.

I don't mind if the controller is 480p, for the size of the screen is a good resolution. But you know, more higher is the number is better.

I want a browser with constant updates.

I have a deal with my father. I give him like 240 US dollars and then he give the rest and buys me the Wii U in my birthday(september). Now i have only 104 US Dollars, but like in two months I going to reach my target.

I don't know but for me the controller is fine. The only problem that I had with it, is that the controller is a power drain. Otherwise, I think the controller is more hardcore than the PS3 and Xbox 360 controller. Why? Because have all the buttons that these controllers have and have a touchscreen and you can play MMORPG games better than the other consoles. Is like a fusion of the consoles with the pc. Wii U king of the hardcore games(I hope)

I think they can do a gaming device with the feature to call people. No a phone with the feature to play games.

Like the others, I want all the features. But the feature i want most, is download full retail games. If a game cost $40 in the United States, in my country the cost is like $75 - $80 US dollars. So in the eshop the prices will be the same that the prices in the United States. 3DS too Nintendo.

wow, i never really thought about that problem... or realized that that was the case, I guess. I know that I've heard a few gamers on these forums complain about the move to digital distribution, because they don't have reliable high-speed internet in their country. is this largely the case outside of the US, or only in a few specific countries?

Well, in my country the speed is too slow, but is better wait a day to play the game, that buy a game that costs $80 for a game that costs $40. Also, the games come to my country like three weeks after the launch in the United States. .

I sure hope not.
Pointing the Wii remote at the screen just to select your game was annoying.
Maybe it could be optional.

What???? the pointer in the Wii was the best feature that the Wii has. I prefer pointing in menus and i hope to play the fps game with the wii remote.

For me is Super Mario 3D Land, but i have to try Kid Icarus Uprising.

I'm happy with noticeably better but obviously, more power is always better.

The price is cool, but i hope a good amount of power in the system.

Is actually coming? Because if is coming I going to be very happy . I always have want to play the game but i don't have ps3 or 360.

Nintendo should hire you to do the menu.

Mine is 4983 - 5184 -1209.
I play MK7 and Star Fox 64 3D, but someday I going to buy Kid Icarus, someday.

This is my 3DS FC: 0989-1743-6989
For online games I've got Resident Evil Revelaitons, Kid Icarus Uprising, and Mario Kart 7.

I've added you

I have a test that day. I want to cry.

So happy about this. Now I can sit on my couch ad watch with NO commercial interruptions.



Damn do you have DVR?

No, I going to watch it in youtube but the problem is I have to study to the next test.

I'm sure the square button next to the power button is the magical screen switcher. It wouldn't make sense to have it on-screen, like in the zelda demo. Just press a button and it probably flips through a few sets the developer or user had pre-set. Some games might have pre-set screen switches, others might allow the user to set what the screen might display and then switch between a few custom settings.

Examples:

Setting 1 = Main game with HUD on TV, map/items on controller
Setting 2 = Main game on TV, HUD, items and map on controller (clean TV mode, I will cry tears of joy if this becomes real)
Setting 3 = Main game with HUD on controller, map/items on screen (+ button needed to switch to item screen here)
Setting 4 = Main game with full HUD on controller, TV not used (full streaming mode)

I like the idea.

The dark blue adds a more mature feel to it. Me gusta. (Now all they need is a black console available on launch day...)

I agree with you, its looks more mature

http://mynintendonew...i-u-controller/

“Our one and only goal once we got the Wii U hardware was to get Darksiders II running on it. We didn’t even have running the game on the touch screen on our ‘to do’ list. but once we got it running, we just fooled around with getting it on the touch screen as a lark. It took all of five minutes and two lines of code, and boom! – there was the entire game running on the controller. Amazing.”

Sure IGN, I going to believe to a anonymous developers and ignore the REAL developers.

I not going to get excited because I was excited for the E3 but Nintendo disappointed me. But I hope this is true, anyways I always going to buy the Wii U.