Hey bsgpro, long time no see.

Indeed sir. Sorry I didn't friend you on this forum.

They need to really make it for the Wii U and anything such as a new FPS like COD and BF will draw more people to it.

I think that an HD Pokemon game would be interesting. I wonder what kind of Pokemon game though, should it be a game like Pokemon Stadium or Pokemon Emerald?

How about a Emerald like mode and then a special mode for Stadium type battle. Or even better make 2 different games.

Rockstar you mean??

Battlefield is more of a simulation FPS and therefor should not be compared to COD. BFP4F is wonderful though it runs on anything. COD is a great game too though.

Cod is my crack and pokemon is my heroin. MW3 is confirmed for the Wii and that is that. Black Ops 2 has more of a chance on the Wii U.

Now over this whole discussion I think that Pokemon is best done at a massive scale with new adventure. Here is another idea to keep people that like Pokemon Stadium more than a full game. Have a mode for it where you shallow it up a bit with custom Pokemon sets and items of your choosing. Now if you are like me and things like this is fun for a few laughs but not really the best game for my Pokegame needs then I would want to see new regions and new Pokemon, like in B&W you can choose which region to start with as well to give it a twist to it. Sound good??

I have a Wii no shuch HD console of Sony or Microsoft is in my house. (PC is different because that is Toshiba) I would just keep my old console and buy the Wii U I still have my Game Cube and still have my original PC, 1997 Gateway oh yeah ran The Need For Speed just fine.

Actually I'm 26 and I read books more often than I play video games. If I want a good story, I'll read a book. If I want to play a video game, let me enjoy the GAME without dealing with what will probably be a worthless story anyway. Super Mario never has a story beyond rescuing the Princess and getting a cake, what's the difference?

The stories of games are most usually godawful and would be better off not existing at all. A simple story that sets up the role playing aspect is all you need and any more than that is usually more than they can write without messing up.

Old Zelda, Mario, Starfox64, Phantasy Star Online, Ikaruga, to name a few off the top of my head, got it right. The last time Nintendo tried in earnest with a real story, we got Twilight Princess, and it just made me laugh.

Even better example. What would "show the capability of the system" better, a game with a simple concept like Sonic Generations, or the convoluted storytelling mess of Sonic Adventure 2?

Well then mister 26 year old. (I really don't care how old you are) I think you just want things simple which is fine. But newer gen people like having some sort of story to a game and want something to scream massive environment. The more environment (If implemented correctly) is better for the life of a game. Variety is one thing you will be missing. On foot kept me interested in the game. I don't have the time to type a long message considering having a job (9-5 to be exact) and having a car and license in a car and on boat. (but thats a bit off track isn't it) I am also a near straight A student. (Near due to some random crap like Spanish) I am 17 btw.

I actually don't even want very much story in a Star Fox game, whatever it takes to come up with an excuse to have a bunch of forest animals flying space superiority fighters. Something fresh is fine, with some cool cutscenes, but I don't really want it to detract from the game...the priority should be constant shooting action

So you want a half done story? You sound like a little child obsessed with shooting things. A space shooter? Yeah that shows the true capability of the system, not really.

Now if you think about it you are comparing tech prices of 2006 to tech prices to now. A HD tv in 2006 was about $2000 for a 42 inch and a 3D HD tv of the same size is just over $1000 today. Wii price of $250 now if you estimate that the Wii was underpowered at that time so I have to guess around $300-350. Simple economics.

Does anyone else find it rather intiresting how some people may abuse...I mean use the video chat feature?

Time for the thread to die I guess.

If Nintendo made a new Pokemon game for the Wii U, it would have too be Pokemon Stadium 3. There are too many games like Pokemon Pearl/Diamond/Emerald/Black/White. Ya, those games are great and all, but I feel the developers are running out of ideas for those type of Pokemon games.
So if they made Pokemon Stadium 3, they would have a lot of ideas! Besides, they haven't made a Pokemon Stadium game in years. All they have to do is add ALL of the Pokemon from the whole Pokemon series, new mini games plus some extra from the old Pokemon Stadium's, A good robust online multiplayer mode, where you can battle people across the world with the Pokemon you choose. I cant think of any other ideas right now, but if anyone thinks of anything else, add it!

They are too shallow of games I want to feel the progression and the great feeling of running around how I please.
There is a reason why Pokemon stadium wasn't made in a long time. It just wasn't deep enough and was shallow. Wasn't a bad game but it is more like a 6.5 out of ten in a way. You can easily make a fresh game that has some ties to its roots. Its a shorter game. One of my friends never played Pokemon and he got Pokemon Stadium and guess what he sold it then I showed him a real Pokemon game with running around and he plays it constantly. BTW games that don't have free roaming in it have a shorter shelf life most of the time. (I am sure there are percentages that show it but I think you get the point) I don't mean to hate on Stadium or anything it was good for about a week but I just see the way handheld Pokemon's much better games. I have over 400 days played total on Pokemon Emerald alone and I have a short attention span........

I say its at least $300 and games would be $60 so I would have to wait until 2012 too!

I played it and well it was pretty boring. I play alot of Pokemon and that game was well about as good as Battle Revolution aka the game that you really needed Diamond or Pearl. Not the best game in the world.
It should have free roaming and I mean Joto, Hoen, and so on to mix up stuff. Just as long as you get a National Dex.
New moves like climb that you don'e have to go around those ledges that seem like you can just walk over.

Custom Gym sounds interesting too.

I have another idea.

The protagonist (you) live in a world where an evil team has developed a device that allows them to control almost all the world's Pokemon (excluding most Legendary Pokemon, need a few for story). Likewise, the local professor has developed a device that allows the protagonist to become somewhat like a Pokemon, more specifically, perform their moves.

So basically, you are the ultimate Pokemon.

You are.... Pokemon U!

Sounds interesting but sounds a bit tacky. I will think about it.

Nope, MW3 will be only on Xbox 360, PS3, and PC. Don't forget that Wii U releases sometime next year after April. Usually companies don't release their game for a newer console after their new game has already been launched. So, to answer all of your questions, Skyrim and MW3 will probably not be on the Wii U. That would be up to the developer and Nintendo if they wanted to port it to the Wii U.

Some companies do that like EA with BattleField 3. It releases very soon and it will be made for the Wii U. Just give it time.

We need new Pokemon Stadium for the Wii U.

Oh no please no. That game is nothing compared to the portable title's adventure and stratagy. It was too simplistic.

WHO!?

You can call it whatever you want, SF Assault 2, SF Command Wii U, SF Peppy Hares & Slippy Toads Hot Action Platinum, there's not much in a name, we're all talking about the same thing: the next Star Fox game that may come to Wii U. Do you really want to make different topics depending on what different people want to call the same unannounced game? lol

I am talking about a sequel to Assault not 64 not the original not Adventures not command. Assault 2 and that is what my topic is about and thats what it stays. Deal with it.

BattleField 3 seems to be a very good game they deem to have set up to be played on the Wii U.

More monsters Tri had to few monsters in it.

BTW I am BSG in Tri.

Edited

"Star Fox Assault 2" is just a placeholder name for the next entry in the series...which happens to be exactly what I was talking about. It could be Star Fox Command Wii U for all we know. What's the difference?

I am talking directly about SFA2 not anything else. Command was a failed attempt to be SF64 for the DS thats the difference.

How about a Pokemon like in the handhelds of the GB all the way to the DS and having a real adventure done in full 1080p? You are free to roam the world like in Pokemon XD for the Gamecube but not stop at dark Pokemon but all of them. You get the standard 8 badges the Elite Four and then the Battle Fronter. And multiple regions as well like the Hoen and the Kento reagons.

Custom Trainer
Custom Pokeballs
Custom Trainer Card
Online and Single Screen Multiplayer (One player on the TV other on the Controller)
3D battle system with new moves
New Items (Plus old)
New Pokemon (Plus old)
New Regions (Plus old)
New gyms (Plus old)
No future stuff (edit)
Better Special moves (fly actually letting you fly)
Custom Gyms (edit)
(I will be updating this with stuff you guys might find interesting in a Pokemon HD game.)