I just saw it, splatoon and mario party looks amazing, I wish mario party monopoly as well, it looked like that.  As for X game, @19:58 of the nintendo direct and up to 20:00 you can see some flora popping up from nowhere, I hope they fix this and it looks really amazing beyond that.

These amibos are very important for nintendo business lately, they make lots of money. Some people are so crazy about them, they even buy them all, so others wont get it and re-sell it much higher after!

Do I want that Majora's Mask 3DS? It looks so good, but I don't need a New 3DS (still rocking the Ocarina of Time one).

They opened with Wii U info. Mario Party, Splatoon, Xenoblade, and more were shown.

then I have to watch it from the beginning.  I only saw the last 30 min.

I saw the last 30 min, no wii U at all... absent... We may have a glimpse of a new wii U2 in 2015 E3...

It was a dedicated for 3ds show?  news articles troll us if it was a dedicated for 3ds. I got an email last night about nintendo direct and wii U X game

There is a way for heavy scratches (they sell some material u can put on and wash after, or use toothpaste and was after, but not for cracks.... i dont think

Its strange, your little girls didnt brake it, but ur wife did.

Then there is no point for a new console, even if wii U sells less than the other 2, whats the point of making something that does not reflect the rest, but nintendo itself only. Just to point out, whatever machine nintendo makes, the way the market is, they will always have decline.  I think thats what the devs pointed out, that nintendo never asks the demands of other companies about their games, in the current state and in the feature. So they decline wii U (thats their oficial rant against nintendo, i think). So many games comming into 360 and ps3 still, but they skip nintendo... Because these things.  Both 360 and ps3 are IBM based machines so its not the IBM cpu the thing that conflicts it.

So its safer to stick with the Wii U and make a console every 10 years or so.  It will still be profitable, slower but profitable.

ps: I think i saw Miyamoto trying the oculus glasses in the last year E3, I hope they wont come with something similar, VR never works.

Humour : In the other hand, I remember nintendo registered a patend before wii U release and (not for wii U as it proved), for weather control, smells of ur house, laundry stuff etc... Do you remember that??? A sensor could detect if you have smelly cloths or dirty cloths, if you need laundry, etc... It could detect the weather otuside ur house and bring it on the game, etc.. I hope thats not the QOL projekt.  Here is information about it http://gonintendo.co...a0141747c2608b0

Its houmor now, but I will rant if I see it coming. 

I want a gaming machine with games and support

Nitnendo must achieve a system capable of 60fps and 1080p in most of games without issues. Also capable of running all next gen engines and not in a ripped off version (cut down)...

PS4 and X1 are not capable of 1080p and 60fps, something is wrong... Nintendo should hit them there.

I would love IBM cpu, but with the latest amd official tweets, I fear that AMD is capitalizing consoles with amd cpu cores... because amd sucks in capitals, in pc after all.

the new nintendo console will come around 2016 and the end of ps4 and x1, will come around 2020-2022.  That will bring nintendos new system in a str8 forward battle. And hopefully many 3rd parties will make games for nintendo this time around.

Another wish for the new system is the capabilities for HUGE world games, like mmos or rpgs... We've read articles by devs, who claimed that PS4 and X1 power is not enough "already", in the AI aspect for their games.... So nintendo, should focus in the AI capabilities of its new system.  This is a second thing, nintendo should look at... to offer even better AI power. 

It has something to do with the cpu power actualy...  So nintendo must give a better cpu than the 8 cores ps4 and x1 using.  To beef them up more, more cache, more transistors whatever they need... just beef them up.

a question, topics like these are good, but is nintendo reading them? What people want?

As for the AI, here is an article http://www.extremete...d-ps4s-weak-cpu

Ubisoft is horrible, but nintendo must give a feature proof system, 

combining this information from AMD, it seems wii U2 comes in 2 years and at 2015 E3, we may have a glimpse

http://mynintendonew...oduced-in-2016/

message from AMD

The design wins are interesting because the funding, the R&D dollars for customizing the parts for the products to our customers is precisely pre-funded by the customer and like I said the workload is started and we are spending the money and the resources and the work to go ahead and design the parts to be introduced sometime in 2016.

We didn’t say at which space it is in. I’m not going to give too much detail. I’ll say that one is x86 and one is ARM, and atleast one will be on gaming, right. But that’s about as much as you going to get out me today, because the customers from the standpoint to be fair to them. It is their product. They launch it. They announce it and then just like the game console or the parts you find out that its AMD’s APU that’s been used in those products.

2 + years have pass and wii U is 8m its not because of the game quality wii U have, its because 3rd devs conspired against wii U from the start. Thats what I believe.  What nitenendo can do in solo mode?  The other ones, even with so much rant from real users, sold 10-15m in a year because devs making games for them.  So if we consider the above statement as a nintendo console, its 4 years exact from wii U release date and 4 years is the minimum for nintendo to bring a new console.  I do believe that wii U will not stop having support from Nitnendo, because wii U is the last console with backwards features.  And they will keep that up also, along with their new product.

but am not happy with amd cpus... lol I would preffer nintendo to stick with IBM. Allready crackers made/working for xbox 1 emmulators  lol.... while they still trying for the 360 which is IBM.

edit: I made a search to check if there is any emulator for x1 (emulates the x1 games in any INTEL PC) and there is 1 actually working! So you dont have to buy x1 if you know u can emulate its games in a cheap I3 PC  (even if the x1 cpu is amd, the emulator runs in INTEL pc).  My point is, choosing x86 platform will totally kill consoles.

with the latest news, I suspect nintendo abandons IBM and moves to a pc technology... AMD also said they built a new cpu+gpu chip for a new console for 2016...

That means, wii U is the last console with backwards support.  Now lets see if Nintendo will make wii U2 a bit more powerful than current x1 and ps4... If they truly use x86 tech, it will be easily comparable.

If they play safe again and make it near to x1 and ps4 hardware, or identical, I consider it as a stupid move... Because the other 2 consoles will be already established and wii U 2 must appeal to others! And normally the super duper specs make people buy things, more than the games

But it will also be clever for nintendo, because when the other 2 consoles will start to straggle, wii U2 will fly even higher... A key point is, Nintendo must give 1080p next gen and 60 fps experience.... That is what all people ask, up to date, ps4 and x1 cant offer that in most of their games.

I also suspect that Metroid open world game, will come with wii U2 (Expanded metroid universe).

I dont think nintendo would ever do that.

They just have to give a more powerful IBM cpu... A 3 core 4 thread per core cpu, would be enough  or 4 cores 16 threads.

IBM cpus have 4 threads per core.  So a 4 core IBM cpu is like 16 cores for amd.  But Nintendo cut wii U cpu down, they cheaped it very much. So its not the IBM we should blame here or to consider IBM as a weak cpu.

We have to blame 2 things for why wii U lucks in 3rd games..

1) Nintendo play safe and they end up without 3rd games. Also nintendo cares allot of making profit from hardware. Cheap hardware and sell it very expensive. Thats what they did with gamecube and wii....

2) Gaming companies, cheap productions costs at maximum.  They create 1 game and they just look to do easy porting, to make more profits.  That is why they dont support wii U.

So as far as I remember, when wii U came out, some paid developers from MS or Sony, start ranting wii U... horrible, weak, junk and whatever...  So they made gamers not to buy it.  I remember the ranting.

They tried to slow down the sales of wii U and they made it...  Wii U start selling more, after ps4 and x1 release... That means something, their slowed it down till they release their own.

Thats because the old publisher was Atari. The new publisher, WB games, has taken on a full force 'modern gamz marketing' stance and are putting more money into marketing than they allotted cd prijekt for development.

Is WB owns the game? I think cd projekt owns it, there is no trademark of wb in the witcher.

The thinks I dont like with the witcher, is based on a book and most of everything we do, is predefined!  But its advertised as an RPG... Its not role play, its a PRPG maybe... but not RPG.  (an action game with open world feeling and sidequests to do).

They dont give housing, hirelings, things to be and do (and things people want) because Witcher is lonely, hateful, everybody hates him.. lol  this is the answers we get...  But at least they give us moding tools.

And the story is wrongly made... Gerald is sterile because of his condition (Albinism) and his evolvement with magick, but even in reallity his kind is related with magick, but they are not steriles.  So, Gerald is actually sterile, but nothing related with his albinism or magick... lol

I will buy it, because I support games without DRMS, but I am more interested in cyberpunk, if its open world and freedom of choice.

lol I havent read the rulles of it, I just saw it on facebook, cd-projekt promotion and gamespot, so I voted zelda wii U and I transfer it here as well, for those who wish to vote

You win something, but I never win, so I never read their rules...

I know the title sounds strange... but all companies like cd-projekt, etc advertising theirs for voting, nobody does for wii U zelda upcoming game.

So Gamespot the gaming website is running a voting competition, for the most anticipated game and the winners will get the winning tittle.

I think it goes something like that... http://www.gamespot....5/1100-6424304/

so if zelda wii U wins, the winners will get a free copy of zelda wii U, etc...  Right now zelda is 5% and The Witcher 3 is 49%!!  CD-Projekt advertise it allot

1) ibm cpu 6 cores 12 threads @ 2.5ghz modern tech  4 or 6mb cache.   (ibm cpus normally have more threads per core, so 6/12 is not a big issue, its allready cut in half)

2) about 2.5 Tflops gpu with mantle support and dx12 features.  (this performance was 3-4 years ago in PC as a maximum per card) so 2.5 when wii U 2 comes, is nothing... it should be 3.

3) 16 gigs of ram, (ddr4) which 2 of them are GDDR5 (graphics memory) -  DDR4 is extremly expensive now, but in a year it will fall about 50% down.  It will be the standard, as ddr3 is today.

basic model comes with 120-200gigs of HDD and the nintendo patent of bluray discs.

I believe this package will outperform the competitors and 3rd support wont be able to complain.

bayo 2 took 9.5 in my country reviews...

here is a review translated by google translator... dont expect the best translation, but you get the point and the spirit.

bayo2 review

and the guy who made the review is a RL friend. He studied in my islands university...  (its rare for this website to give 9.5)

the biggest mistake is the FIRST PERSON only... it should be both, like every other mmo... (wow, eso, wildstar, etc) That is why I would never buy it.

The making new franchises part is a great idea but, the ''upgrading'' consoles is a bad idea,you would be doing what Sega did with the Genesis and the 32x and Sega CD add ons to improve the system. in the end they overwhelmed the consumer and the system end up failing after their first years of glory when it was just... Genesis. After losing money on those add ons and consumer trust, they released a half baked console (Sega Saturn) and totally lost it there making them have to rush to release the Dreamcast and ending up losing dramatically against the PS2 one year later... you would also make Nintendo go to bankrupsy. 

Stik with the making new franchises thing and everythings gonna be fine lol. 

then locked hardware and unlocking when the time comes with new bios.. I am against the low lifespan of a console, if the console have potential.  If wii was a better hardware, nintendo could still keep that and the 110million users!  Unlock more potential and keep going.

I grow with super nintendo, so I ave experienced the 32x... it was not a big deal, thats why it failed. The games was not a big difference! I remember 32x came out and nintendo made the donkey kong that looked even better!  But it had hardware accelerator inside the cartridge!  So u see?  Its not the 32x, it was just not a big deal.

I also think nintendo used a 32fx chip or something, inside some games... I cant remember, so many years. But it worked out!

What would you do? 

I would..
- Buy Capcom
  > Bring back Mega Man and proper Resident Evils
  > Possibly older titles, and make a new Eternal Darkness game (?)
- Push Nintendo into Mobile
  > Apparently they have this Kirby Epic yarn picture modifier, and that would've been a good app.
- Improve Club Nintendo / Nintendo Network
  > Keep the rewards, but just have a general store.
- Create a Zelda Maker, and expand Mario Maker both through DLC
  > Such as Music creation.
- Nintendo Coloring Book on Wii U
- Pay 1/4 of dev cost for third parties to publish games on Wii U.
- Expand games, give games like Punch Out, Excite, Wars more presence.
- Give the eShop better UI. 

 

You would bankrupt nintendo

I personally, would keep it as it is, 1 desktop console and 1 handheld.  But I would offer a strong desktop console and for more than 5 years.  I dont understand their logic into life spans... I would keep built quality up, expandable machines (a wii U that can get upgrades, such us more ram and a dual gpu for feature games) and the lifespan would be 10-15 years, if I had nintendo. I would preffer instead of focusing in attractive cheap hardware, to offer a platform for many years and invest in games, instead of research in new ways of play... lol

I would focus in open world games and new franchises, for both casual and hard core. And I would buy a western studio, because nitendo is all about eastern culture and gameplay. They luck in western likes.  Everything has to do with elfs, moon and turtles.   An example is Crytek right now is in the brick of bankruptcy, I would buy crytek and Konami (because Konami has the football game, also Mr. Snake).

I would also make a series of metroid games, like a mass effect series and style...

I am against mobility, so no interest of pushing nintendo into mobile... even my personal mobile phone is 12 years old.. lol

really?  They advertise it in big gaming websites and they also have a facebook page.. lol

and read that.. http://www.onlysp.co...al-kickstarter/

The oficial stalker webpage supports it.. lol anyway if its a fraud, its not my fault!

Have you seen this guys?

If it makes it, it will also come into wii U.

https://www.kickstar...577656602/areal

video included in the link.

The game is next gen and it comes for Wii U, ps4, xbox one and PC

http://mynintendonew...endo-president/

 

Awesome!

.

Hopping its not a kind of elections we saw in Korea, he took 100%  hahahaha kidding. 

Ok lets let him do his job now

if its new, can u turn it back and get another?  U got 7 days for refund or free replacement from the store, go go go... lol

here is another guy with the same problem  http://www.gamefaqs....-wii-u/69377429

lets be honest, Ubisoft already said, that this game is a family game, for friends and family.

I believe UBISOFT is confused for what wii U can be or do... Even the prev gen 360 and ps3, get all games from them, far cry, etc, but wii U that can do better, gets a family game if it sales good?

I dont think I care about ubisoft. Wii U lost the latest assassins creed game..

I believe, companies, dont want nintendo to focus in hard core audience, because it will drain the food from sony and ms... Look at MS, they are doomed, but ubisoft gives willingly, all its resources to it.

heres the latest japan charts, wii U did good... http://mynintendonew...ii-u-sells-12k/

So we indeed may see better sales the week during E3 for the wii U.