This isn't a glitch, it's intentional so that people don't flood a thread with video boxes. Same reason there's a limit to image links.
- Gimbal and PyroKinesis like this
Male
Posted by Waller
on 23 March 2014 - 04:35 PM
This isn't a glitch, it's intentional so that people don't flood a thread with video boxes. Same reason there's a limit to image links.
Posted by Azure-Edge
on 10 March 2014 - 08:56 PM
I'm done with posting actual opinions on this forum.
No one wants actual discussion, they just want to be jerks. There's no point.

Welcome to the internet, love.
Posted by Dankey Kang
on 16 February 2014 - 02:14 PM
Posted by KingBoo
on 15 February 2014 - 09:12 AM
Posted by iEatTacos
on 15 February 2014 - 07:31 AM
Posted by Hunter
on 05 February 2014 - 07:18 AM
Do you really think that people like Justin Bieber are going to be hurt if every single person doesn't buy his song? No. Illegal downloading has been going on for years and I don't think the music industry has been hurt that much from it. And besides that, there are people like me who cannot buy some of there music and need a place to download it. I don't listen to most stuff on the radio, I usually listen too video game OST and what not, things that you usually cannot purchase.
This is the defence that every illegal downloader uses.
People think that illegal downloading is ok because it wont effect rich pop stars, which is true. But when people don't buy music the record companies have less money, which means they have less money to invest in new bands. The more money they have, the more quality bands they will invest in.
It hasn't effected the music industry? Then why have album sales halved in the 10 years since napster came out?
As for the "I can't afford to pay for music" excuse; too horsing bad. I can't afford to buy video games all the time but I don't go around to the shop and steal them.
Posted by Hunter
on 05 February 2014 - 05:28 AM
Posted by
DANT3
on 28 January 2014 - 04:33 PM
I sure wish Feld0 would come and fix his goddamn website.
Posted by
DANT3
on 28 January 2014 - 02:06 PM
Before anything, Rules wont do ANYTHING. I promise you that.
If people break the rules, ban them. It's that simple.
Posted by Abcdude
on 21 January 2014 - 08:46 AM

Nintendo will become the apple of gaming.
Posted by Raiden
on 17 January 2014 - 10:49 AM
This isn't sports. He doesn't need to. He had 3 massively successful platforms. Just because one is struggling does not mean fire a guy. Nintendo will be fine and people can shove the fire Iwata carp up their ass. Also firing him now would shake up the company so bad do far more damage than good.
Things will get fixed and even if they are making massive bank people will doom them and call for heads for another reason
Posted by Zinix
on 18 December 2013 - 05:50 PM
Noting that the PlayStation Vita's (and soon to be HD re-release for console) Assassin's Creed Liberation and other future portable Assassin's Creed titles were left out of this category, interest peaked as to what Ubisoft has planned for multiple Assassin's Creed releases within one year.
Contacting sources familiar with these projects, it has come to fruition that Ubisoft has two Assassin's Creed titles planned for 2014; one being a next-gen (PlayStation 4/Xbox One) exclusive while the other designated for the current crop of now last-generation consoles (PlayStation 3/Xbox 360).
The source also mentioned that the series is under a massive re-scope, but couldn't elaborate any further. As always, this information is not confirmed by Ubisoft and must be considered rumor for now, so take everything with a grain of salt.
http://www.examiner....eloped-for-2014
I hate this series at this point.
Posted by Hank Hill
on 12 December 2013 - 06:21 PM
So your big solution is to
I think we have a winner! You get a gold star.

FYI: Sega did this kind of crap with the Sega Genesis/Saturn/Dreamcast. You know where that got them? BANKRUPT.
Find content