Name-calling isn't the basis of my argument, its facts unlike yours which is 90% subjectivity.
Facts.
"If you think those games are better than Wind Waker then you're kidding yourself" - opinion
"Rayman Legends was pretty irrelevent" - opinion "and not big sales-wise" - It still sold better on the Wii U than the other versions earlier on.
"The animal crossing/splatoon team made Nintendo Land" - Splatoon is made by a new development team, created for the sole reason of creating new experiences.
"You saying all PS4 games are bad is dumb" - name-calling again "you don't own a PS4 and are going of the masses opinions" - the masses opinions are more correct then yours will ever be.
"Killzone and Destiny are way more gamer-focused than any of the Nintendo party games" - opinion.
"Nintendo more likely chose Donkey Kong because it would sell better" - Retro chose Donkey Kong, not Nintendo. They knew they had more ideas to play with for Donkey Kong, and simply didn't feel like making a Metroid game at that point in time. Had they made a Metroid game it probably would have been uninspired and boring.
"If I were to critique a game such as ZombiU you would tell me to play it myself" - ZombiU was pretty bad IMHO.
So... Facts, eh?
- KeptMyWiiUAndLeftTheForums and Raiden like this


Find content
Male





