12 replies to this topic

[MorbidGod]

Hey guys, I have a pretty cool idea for an online RTS and online Shooter game.

These two games would have to be releases at the same time. And the way it would work is the FPS would work in teams of six. And a seventh player, which would be from the RTS game, would be their commander. So the commander will give commands and the six shooter players - who each has some NP units that will follow their example - can choose to follow those commands or not. So, if you tell your men to go on a suicide mission they might end up doing something else.

I think this could really shake up the RTS genre. What do you guys think?

Edit: It's possible that this could just be the same game, but you have an option to play as a soldier or commander.

[Mewbot]

All the soldiers would never follow their commander. You'd need some kind of incentive to make them do that.

[Auzzie Wingman]

Commander gets a "Kill Rogue" action for anyone being deviant to any strategy plan. Commander cannot use this if they do follow the plan.

 

Massive rewards if other soldiers engage in hunting down the rogue. Successfully going rogue means the best rewards, but the Commander doesn't necessarily need human soldiers to eliminate rogues.

 

Basically, if you want to go rogue, do it right, not on a whim.

Edited by Auzzie Wingman, 29 March 2014 - 06:00 AM.

[xile6]

So you want battlefield 4?

[nbond3040]

So Savage 2 but with soilders

 

heres savage 2 if you haven't heard of it

 

http://www.ign.com/g...-soul/pc-769090

[Chrop]

This sounds exactly like battlefields 4 commander role. People don't tend to listen to it anyway. Also you would need to buy both games just to get the full experience and understand how the gameplay works. 3/10

[tboss]

have both in the same game, also give the commando some ai controled units, so the players act more like hero units than normal units. also make it so the hero units wouldnt normaly be able to stand up to a hord of normal units

 

also would be a good idea to make the hero players upgradeable.

[MorbidGod]

Commander gets a "Kill Rogue" action for anyone being deviant to any strategy plan. Commander cannot use this if they do follow the plan.

Massive rewards if other soldiers engage in hunting down the rogue. Successfully going rogue means the best rewards, but the Commander doesn't necessarily need human soldiers to eliminate rogues.

Basically, if you want to go rogue, do it right, not on a whim.

Great idea!

So you want battlefield 4?

I didn't know Battlefield 4 was like that.

So Savage 2 but with soilders

heres savage 2 if you haven't heard of it

http://www.ign.com/g...-soul/pc-769090

I haven't heard of that game, is it fun?

[Auzzie Wingman]

I didn't know Battlefield 4 was like that.

 

A player can choose to play as a team's Commander. The basically hold an overview of the playing field, mark objectives and enemies, get score.

 

It's practically backseat though, and you'd only try that if you want to get ALL THE THINGS!

[xile6]

Great idea!


I didn't know Battlefield 4 was like that.


I haven't heard of that game, is it fun?

they have commander mode.

also the new game from ghost recon does this also.

[iEatTacos]

That does sound like bf4 commander mode, but I like the idea. Give the squad a really really good reason to follow the commanders orders. And make the separate commander game ALOT less price wise than the fps game

[nbond3040]

I haven't heard of that game, is it fun?

I haven't played it personally but a while ago when this game was at it's peak I saw a friend playing it and thought it was interesting but at the time I had no computer to play it so I watched a little bit of gameplay it looks pretty fun but it seems kind of like League in the way that if you get a team of just complete idiots it will be a frustrating match

[Mahmoodinho98]

so its similar to battlefield 4 commander  mode , you can use the same idea but improve it and add whats missing in battlefield commander mode.