Jump to content


Photo

Wii U graphics question... will you be satisfied?


  • Please log in to reply
66 replies to this topic

#61 Arkhandar

Arkhandar

    Dry Bones

  • Members
  • 479 posts
  • Fandom:
    Zelda, Metroid, Mario, Kirby, DK

Posted 13 April 2013 - 07:59 AM

Personally, looking at the graphics in Lego City Undercover (an exemple), they look pretty darn good for what it is.  Then, again, it may not be using the WiiU at full capacity graphic-wise but, still, it looks great. I'm not a graphics whore: I'm not looking for top notch graphics with the best physics ever, etc, etc, etc. As long as it looks good and not an half-assed job, whatever resolution (depends on the game console generation here), I'll be happy.

 

 

 

A 4k console? In your dreams... for now. Even a the nVidia GeForce GTX Titan can't even run a game full quality at 4k at a decent framerate. And, that's the most powerful single-GPU on the market (at 1000$ a pop). In Unigine, in 2560x1600, it only gets ~45fps. Note that UltraHD (aka 4k) is 7680x4320. How would you plan to make a console, at this present date, when the most power single-GPU card on the market can't even run something smooth in 2560x1600 in a GPU Benchmark software? And how UltraHD TVs are crazy expensive? Tell me about it.

 

Now, I also know that you are hypothetical here.

 

Ultra HD (UHD) is a label for 4K and 8K compatible televisions.

 

4K UHDTV actually has a resolution of 3840 × 2160 (2160p), 4 times the pixels of 1920 × 1080.

8K UHDTV has a resolution of 7680 × 4320 (4320p), 16 times the pixels of current 1080p HDTV, 


If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?

Posted Image

#62 MorbidGod

MorbidGod

    Hammer Bro.

  • Members
  • 1,717 posts

Posted 13 April 2013 - 04:48 PM

Will I be? Well, I am satisfied. So yes.
Whovian12 -- Nintendo Network ID.

#63 Nintyfan86

Nintyfan86

    Bob-omb

  • Members
  • 262 posts

Posted 13 April 2013 - 08:22 PM

Ultra HD (UHD) is a label for 4K and 8K compatible televisions.

 

4K UHDTV actually has a resolution of 3840 × 2160 (2160p), 4 times the pixels of 1920 × 1080.

8K UHDTV has a resolution of 7680 × 4320 (4320p), 16 times the pixels of current 1080p HDTV, 

How many inches of display size will we need to even notice 8k? I can see 42'' for the sharpness we have on a 21'', 1080p monitor. So, 84'' seems right in order to get the most from it. I am wondering if 4k vs. 8k at 42'' will be like 720p vs. 1080p at 32 inches-negligible unless up close.



#64 thunderspider

thunderspider

    Spear Guy

  • Members
  • 85 posts

Posted 17 April 2013 - 08:47 PM

I'm not sure if even in next gen we will have 4k in games, unless the price drops a lot, i can't hope so certainly



#65 cannonshane

cannonshane

    Piranha Plant

  • Members
  • 925 posts
  • Fandom:
    Luigi

Posted 17 April 2013 - 10:35 PM

Has anyone actually seen a 4k tv ? I was lucky enough to view one at a convention when i was in Europe. I will be honest, I wasn't that impressed. It looked better than 1080P sure, But not that much better.   


Staff Writer at http://www.allagegaming.com/

 

Strayaaaaaaaaaa Mate


#66 MorbidGod

MorbidGod

    Hammer Bro.

  • Members
  • 1,717 posts

Posted 18 April 2013 - 08:09 AM

I'm not sure if even in next gen we will have 4k in games, unless the price drops a lot, i can't hope so certainly


Sony has said no 4K in games.
Whovian12 -- Nintendo Network ID.

#67 routerbad

routerbad

    Lakitu

  • Section Mods
  • 2,013 posts
  • NNID:routerbad
  • Fandom:
    Zelda, Mario, Halo, Star Trek

Posted 18 April 2013 - 11:10 AM

How many inches of display size will we need to even notice 8k? I can see 42'' for the sharpness we have on a 21'', 1080p monitor. So, 84'' seems right in order to get the most from it. I am wondering if 4k vs. 8k at 42'' will be like 720p vs. 1080p at 32 inches-negligible unless up close.

The aspect ratio is different as well, so the sizes will vary accordingly when the technology starts to come out.  42" wouldn't be what we think of 42" today, because the aspect ratio would differ.  Similar to when 1080p 16:9 became the standard for widescreen after 16:10 widescreen already had decent market penetration, then all of the monitor and TV makers switched to the "class" sizing system.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users

Anti-Spam Bots!