Devastating in a good way or bad? I think i read before that some CPU company, I'm pretty sure it was Intel, was doing the same thing with multiple samples of conventional RAM instead of on-chip eDRAM and eSRAM, and implemented it on a low latency MCM as a cache. GDDR5 maximized performance the best.
Bad way. Gddr5 latency is absolutely horrible, so its no surprise at all it would see the maximum performance boost of putting it on die via mcm. It has tge most ground to cover.
Also, im now positive this 'max clock frequency' is referring to the wi fi.
I wasnt sure at first if 'fcc' was the same old federal communications committee' and 'journalists' were just completely incompetent, or if some new 'fancy computer corp', or a new subdivision of fcc that tested more than commo, or something else newer i didnt know about ran the test.
I gave 'journalists too much credit.... Again. Its indeed the federal commo committe, and its indeed testing the communications equipment, and has nothing to do with cpu or gpu.
www.cclab.com/fcc-testing.htm