15 replies to this topic

[YoshiGamer9]

http://www.zeldainfo...e3#.VYLg0TBViko

 

 

This mentality...

 

I'm pretty sure Zelda fans would have been LESS frustrated if they showed it off rather than not showing it off at all...

[Portal]

I don't get this. I'm pretty sure E3 is generally seen as different company's showing games that will release in three months to three years. Zelda U wouldn't have been a disappointment. It could only be reinforcement. They could've done a regular ND for closer releases. I just...ugh.

[Scumbag]

"We showed it last year as we thought it would be a 2015 released" eh, why not show it this year then if its not coming until 2016.

The contradiction.

[NintendoReport]

Guys, Reggie and all of the big wigs at Nintendo are puppets. Who's really pulling the strings?

Henson company and Disney.

[YoshiGamer9]

Guys, Reggie and all of the big wigs at Nintendo are puppets. Who's really pulling the strings?

Henson company and Disney.

 

They better make a summer direct that is zelda U specific in 30 or so minutes in length

 

If not then we might have to wait until the VGA awards again to see anything...

[SPG]

 

They better make a summer direct that is zelda U specific in 30 or so minutes in length

 

If not then we might have to wait until the VGA awards again to see anything...

i really dont want to sit through another vga rewards just to see zelda, that was painful to watch last year, it will be painful to watch this year

Edited by SPG, 18 June 2015 - 10:33 AM.

[YoshiGamer9]

i really dont want to sit through another vga rewards jsut tos ee zelda, that was painful to watch last year, it will be painful to watch this year

 

I did last year.. it wasn't fun lol

[aaron]

Reggie Fils-Aime: “... We just fundamentally don’t believe in showing content at E3 that is going to be a long term proposition. We like to show content that typically will launch in the upcoming Holiday and maybe extending into the first half of the following year." 

with that logic, SMT x FE shouldn't have been shown like 2 years ago, lmao.

[YoshiGamer9]

Reggie Fils-Aime: “... We just fundamentally don’t believe in showing content at E3 that is going to be a long term proposition. We like to show content that typically will launch in the upcoming Holiday and maybe extending into the first half of the following year." 

with that logic, SMT x FE shouldn't have been shown like 2 years ago, lmao.

 

I guess this is a new rule they're doing.

[Chrop]

So they announce games from years ago that still haven't come out, but they only focus on games that's coming out within 9 months? What?

 

The more I hear about E3 the more painful it is...

[Hunter]

Well I guess the good news is that next years E3 will probably be a great one with Zelda U and NX

[Lupaie]

Well I guess the good news is that next years E3 will probably be a great one with Zelda U and NX

I don't care. With this management the next will fail even harder

[NintendoReport]

Sometimes it is better if the puppet heads just ignore the questions and talk about something else. This double talk and confusion makes them look bad and leaves a bad taste in everybody's mouth.

 

[Scumbag]

[Raiden]

 

Yup

[Marcus]

I think this roughly translates to "it's a christmas 2016 release, that's a long way off".

 

If it was a Spring release in 2016, you'd think this E3 would've been an OK time to show it off. Hell, look at the FF7 remake. Does anyone think that's coming within the next 2 years?