38 replies to this topic

[Oni-Link]

It sucks that the controller isn't multi-touch though, single touch really sucks in today's touch screens

Single and Multi touch is No Differenet to me Really.And i rather just use single touch with the Stylus then Using my Fingers to Dirty up the screen.

Ontop of that,Apple just won a Patent on "Multi-Touch"

Edited by Oni-Link, 23 June 2011 - 01:43 PM.

[abbe]

Cant somebody invent double-single touch? (multitouch compatible with styluses). :PPP

[Oni-Link]

theres no such thing,if its multi-touch,then you can use 2 stylus's

[abbe]

theres no such thing,if its multi-touch,then you can use 2 stylus's

Yea i just kidding, but is multitouch really compatible with styluses?

[Caius Casshern Sins]

Yea i just kidding, but is multitouch really compatible with styluses?

BBase from what i heard it probably can, but it will not be as precise as a resistive touch screen.

[Oni-Link]

Yeah what ZxRide said o_o

I never did like Touching the screen with my fingers though,which is why i love the stylus.wish the ipod touch came with a stylus,but oh well,the Itouch is made for finger movements

[Splint]

As long as you can have multiple tabs open and keep pages saved in the background while playing a game.

[Alex Atkin UK]

theres no such thing,if its multi-touch,then you can use 2 stylus's

Actually my laptop has a dual-touch resistive screen, which means it will work with two stylus as well although I don't think there is any software on Windows that would show off that function (drawing packages only expect a single stylus at a time).

There are a few simple games that use two people operating the touch screen at the same time, but those really show the disadvantages of resistive screens - its not really sensitive enough for quick movements for those sorts of games.

It works fine for pinch/zoom though and two fingers to rotate Virtual Earth or photos, which is the main thing people use multi touch for anyway. Mostly though I just use it to scroll web pages up and down, flick left to right for back, right to left for forwards (like turning pages).

Edited by Alex Atkin UK, 24 June 2011 - 04:20 PM.

[abbe]

I think it is a little sad that the screen isnt resistive cuz it would be nice to surf on it like on an ipad

[HermantoWang]

If the controller built in web browser than the controller also built in WIFI too ??

[Alex Atkin UK]

I don't think its a built-in web browser in the controller, I think what was meant is that the web browser can be viewed entirely on the controller.

[The Lonely Koopa]

If the controller built in web browser than the controller also built in WIFI too ??

No its streaming the web browser from the console.

[Oni-Link]

Actually my laptop has a dual-touch resistive screen, which means it will work with two stylus as well although I don't think there is any software on Windows that would show off that function (drawing packages only expect a single stylus at a time).

There are a few simple games that use two people operating the touch screen at the same time, but those really show the disadvantages of resistive screens - its not really sensitive enough for quick movements for those sorts of games.

It works fine for pinch/zoom though and two fingers to rotate Virtual Earth or photos, which is the main thing people use multi touch for anyway. Mostly though I just use it to scroll web pages up and down, flick left to right for back, right to left for forwards (like turning pages).

i said multi-touch can work with 2 stylus's

@Alex: It Streams from the console

[Bill Cipher]

Spoiler

I can Agree.
OT: I really hope that for this game, the designers/artists pick a new style once again. Games like Wind waker were beautiful and still look good by today's standards

[HermantoWang]

No its streaming the web browser from the console.

Than there is a streaming the web browser from console OR built in web browser ????
Its make me more confusing

[The Lonely Koopa]

Than there is a streaming the web browser from console OR built in web browser ????
Its make me more confusing

Its streaming the web browser from the console the controller does not have its own web browser.

[Dementis]

Than there is a streaming the web browser from console OR built in web browser ????
Its make me more confusing

You're right, it does make you more confusing

I'm just kidding (Though if English is your first language then I am disappointed).

It means that the web browser is streamed from the console.

[HermantoWang]

Its streaming the web browser from the console the controller does not have its own web browser.

You're right, it does make you more confusing

I'm just kidding (Though if English is your first language then I am disappointed).

It means that the web browser is streamed from the console.

Than how about this tread title ? Its said controller to have built in web browser??

Edited by HermantoWang, 26 June 2011 - 07:11 AM.

[Caius Casshern Sins]

Maybe, you access the web browser through the controller.