Edited by Jerson, 14 July 2011 - 05:48 PM.
Wii U graphics capabilities
#1
Posted 13 July 2011 - 07:48 PM
#2
Posted 13 July 2011 - 07:53 PM
#3
Posted 13 July 2011 - 07:59 PM
#4
Posted 13 July 2011 - 08:11 PM
Co-Leader of the A.D.P.F
Lose yourself in battle, and rejoice
After War there is Death ~ Goddess Palutena, victory is ours
Yeah, you've done a great job so far, letting the Metal Heads destroy the palace.
#5
Posted 13 July 2011 - 08:21 PM
I don't know. I haven't seen future console graphics yet.
/beingcaptainobvious
If you're worried about a masssive graphical leap, don't be. I don't think we will evolve from HD for quite some time, and the Wii U is already been confirmed to have better images than PS360 (Gearbox talking about Aliens: Colonial Marines.)
Trophy Cards are classy too! LOLZIGZAGOON
#6
Posted 14 July 2011 - 01:41 AM
#7
Posted 14 July 2011 - 01:49 AM
#8
Posted 14 July 2011 - 04:47 AM
#9
Posted 14 July 2011 - 04:47 AM
Edited by The Lonely Koopa, 14 July 2011 - 04:49 AM.
#10
Posted 14 July 2011 - 08:40 AM
We know that both answers say that the WiiU will be overpowered, but one answer says the WiiU will be significantly over powered (see "Wii vs 360"), and the other says it will only be a slight and unnoticeable difference (see "360 vs PS3").both the poll answers are negative since if the wiiu is the wii of next generation it would have the graphics of the ps3 and 360 its the same thing for both answers.
#11
Posted 14 July 2011 - 09:21 AM
oh I missread the last answer I wish i could change my answer to the last one I though it said it was only the same power as the 360 and ps3 that why I choose the wii one since it was slightly more powerful than the last gen.We know that both answers say that the WiiU will be overpowered, but one answer says the WiiU will be significantly over powered (see "Wii vs 360"), and the other says it will only be a slight and unnoticeable difference (see "360 vs PS3").
#12
Posted 14 July 2011 - 11:05 AM
Don'y worry man, it happens to everyone.oh I missread the last answer I wish i could change my answer to the last one I though it said it was only the same power as the 360 and ps3 that why I choose the wii one since it was slightly more powerful than the last gen.
#13
Posted 15 July 2011 - 09:12 AM
So as not to be a hypocrite, here is a video from IGN detailing some of the exact differences that I think will exist between the WiiU and its future competition. The video outlines the differences between Crysis 2 running in DirectX9 (WiiU will be able to push 10.1, so it will be capable of doing slightly more than 9, but none of the advanced tesselation or real-time reflection mapping) and DirectX11. It seems likely that Sony, at least, will wait until they can produce hardware that will run DX11 (though even this would be prohibitively expensive if attempted right now... the commentators referenced major framerate issues at points, and this was a top-of-the-line gaming rig). Still, say what you will about Sony, they spring for the best stuff out there. The PSVita is a good example of that, and evidence against the people who keep saying that Sony has "learned their lesson" with the PS3 and its lack of profitability. And please, for the love of God, don't throw that one quotation from the windbag Sony rep at me... let's look at concrete decisions the company has and is making, not off-hand comments.
Now, I say this looks pretty good for the WiiU. I'm no Sony fan (in fact, most days I think I would open a bottle of old bubbly if the company went under)... but I think they will make a top-of-the-line machine with their next console, and I still say that, even this being the case, the jump is not that big of a deal. Do I like real-time reflection mapping and advanced particle tracking with motion blur effects? Sure... but I can wait six or seven years for them to find the hardware to run them cheaply and efficiently without losing any sleep at all (and my wallet will thank me).
#14
Posted 16 July 2011 - 06:10 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users