Edited by Meelow100, 24 April 2012 - 01:59 PM.
Nintendo better make sure they keep there promise on amazing third party support
#1
Posted 24 April 2012 - 01:49 PM
#2
Posted 24 April 2012 - 01:58 PM
Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
#3
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:00 PM
Delete this thread before people make fun of you It was a joke.
https://twitter.com/#!/IGN
I do not know how to delete so I changed the topic.
#4 Guest_TRON_*
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:01 PM
#5
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:04 PM
I do not know how to delete so I changed the topic.
Was this originally about Rich from IGN's tweet? just wondering...
And yes, they definately do need to put up or shut up with the third party support. I will say that things look good so far...
#7
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:08 PM
Was this originally about Rich from IGN's tweet? just wondering...
And yes, they definately do need to put up or shut up with the third party support. I will say that things look good so far...
It was.
#9
Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:02 PM
If anything, Nintendo platforms are where the developers come to make something new.
Look at all those games, how many of those have tried to go across to the HD Twins and absolutely failed to grab a market there, or are trying soon?
But hey, if you want the same old poop year-in year-out, go right ahead and complain.
Edited by Nollog, 24 April 2012 - 03:03 PM.
- Schroedus, Crackkat and EternalDeadman like this
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/thewiiu/public_html/ips_kernel/HTMLPurifier/HTMLPurifier/DefinitionCache/Serializer.php:133) in /home/thewiiu/public_html/ips_kernel/classAjax.php on line 328
{"success":1,"post":"\n\n
\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
#10
Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:41 PM
- Robotic Sunshine Commander likes this
#11
Posted 24 April 2012 - 04:01 PM
Since the N64 third parties have had an excuse not to develop for Nintendo. Some were legit.
Nintendo 64 "We don't want to spend the money on publishing cartridges, they cost too much to produce. Also, they don't allow for expansive worlds."
GameCube "The disc sizes are only 1.5GB. We need DVD size discs to realize our vision. Too many things would need to be cutout to fit on the minidisc." "GameCube is kiddy. There is no market there for our game."
Wii "Hardware is too weak. Motion controls should be used in a unique way and we don;t want to do just a straight port without taking advantage of the controller" "Wii is a toy." "Wii has no online"
Wii U addresses all these issues by having online, Blu-ray discs (25GB), great hardware that is better than the PS3 at least, innovative controller that also has standard buttons to allow for normal games, easy to port to because of a similiar architecture to 360, HD graphics, paying for middleware software for smaller developers to use for free, etc.
Nintendo not getting third party support for the Wii U will not be Nintendo's fault. Third parties will not have any excuses not to develop for Nintendo this generation. If they don't, it is a personal choice and not a fault with the Wii U.
Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
#12
Posted 24 April 2012 - 06:45 PM
Nintendo needs to be careful this gen. This is the first gaming console that doesn;t have something holding it back, thus giving third parties excuses not to port over to it. Third parties are needed to gain marketshare and Nintendo acknowledged this at last E3. They saw the slumping sales of the Wii and gaps in software launches. Hell, the Xbox brand has survived off of third parties, since their first party games (Gears and Halo the exception) don't sell as well as Nintendo and Sony's first party titles.
Since the N64 third parties have had an excuse not to develop for Nintendo. Some were legit.
Nintendo 64 "We don't want to spend the money on publishing cartridges, they cost too much to produce. Also, they don't allow for expansive worlds."
GameCube "The disc sizes are only 1.5GB. We need DVD size discs to realize our vision. Too many things would need to be cutout to fit on the minidisc." "GameCube is kiddy. There is no market there for our game."
Wii "Hardware is too weak. Motion controls should be used in a unique way and we don;t want to do just a straight port without taking advantage of the controller" "Wii is a toy." "Wii has no online"
Wii U addresses all these issues by having online, Blu-ray discs (25GB), great hardware that is better than the PS3 at least, innovative controller that also has standard buttons to allow for normal games, easy to port to because of a similiar architecture to 360, HD graphics, paying for middleware software for smaller developers to use for free, etc.
Nintendo not getting third party support for the Wii U will not be Nintendo's fault. Third parties will not have any excuses not to develop for Nintendo this generation. If they don't, it is a personal choice and not a fault with the Wii U.
Good way to point out all of Nintendo's problems. It seems that they are doing everything right this time.
But Nintendo isn't using Blu-Ray discs for the Wii U. They made their own optical disc for the Wii U that uses the same capacity as a Blu-Ray disc.
#13
Posted 24 April 2012 - 06:56 PM
Good way to point out all of Nintendo's problems. It seems that they are doing everything right this time.
But Nintendo isn't using Blu-Ray discs for the Wii U. They made their own optical disc for the Wii U that uses the same capacity as a Blu-Ray disc.
Wii U is actully using Blu-Ray, they just took the movie feature out, like the Wii it uses DVD but they took out the movie feature.
#14
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:00 PM
On a more serious note I don't see how Nintendo can blow this for those who want those 'hardcore' games.
#15
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:06 PM
Wii U is actully using Blu-Ray, they just took the movie feature out, like the Wii it uses DVD but they took out the movie feature.
If it used blu-ray, them cutting out the movie feature wouldn't be worth it. Them making an in-house HD disc is much cheaper.
#16
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:07 PM
But now im off that little rant lol yah i think that nintendo will definately keep thier promise with heavily supporting third parties, but i cant tell the future so idk
#17
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:30 PM
If it used blu-ray, them cutting out the movie feature wouldn't be worth it. Them making an in-house HD disc is much cheaper.
Not really, this is what THQ said.
http://mynintendonews.com/2011/09/25/nintendo-wii-u-thq-say-buying-wii-u-games-is-like-buying-blu-ray-over-a-standard-dvd/
"Buying Wii U Games Is Like Buying Blu-Ray Over A Standard DVD"
#18
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:33 PM
Not really, this is what THQ said.
http://mynintendonew...a-standard-dvd/
"Buying Wii U Games Is Like Buying Blu-Ray Over A Standard DVD"
Nowhere does it say that the Wii U uses Blu-Ray. It's simply a comparison stating the difference.
#19
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:38 PM
Nowhere does it say that the Wii U uses Blu-Ray. It's simply a comparison stating the difference.
The Wii is DVD, the Wii U is Blu-Ray.
#20
Posted 24 April 2012 - 07:41 PM
The Wii is DVD, the Wii U is Blu-Ray.
Although Wikipedia is not 100% trustworthy, read this: http://en.wikipedia....do_optical_disc
EDIT: To add on to that, it does NOT say that Wii U uses Blu-Ray in that article you showed me.
Edited by DR4G0NB0RN, 24 April 2012 - 07:43 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users