Jump to content


Photo

Rayman Legends delay results in 30 new levels, several new boss fights


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#41 ameritt

ameritt

    Spiny

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • Fandom:
    Pokemon, Zelda, Fire Emblem

Posted 16 April 2013 - 11:11 AM


But, I did ask for a source, where the information came from. Either way, then it's not a "no" is it then? He didn't say it was coming to other consoles, or anything really.

Yeah, but if you literally type it into google you can find the interview really easily, that's what he was saying

http://www.ign.com/a...n-30-new-levels

He doesn't specifically say "for every console" but it's implied



#42 Half

Half

    Blooper

  • Members
  • 170 posts
  • NNID:HalfName
  • Fandom:
    Curse all fanboys/girls.

Posted 16 April 2013 - 01:05 PM

Yeah, but if you literally type it into google you can find the interview really easily, that's what he was saying

http://www.ign.com/a...n-30-new-levels

He doesn't specifically say "for every console" but it's implied


But, that's my point, he said no, and I asked for a source, and there isn't one. That's the source for him implying, not confirming, so there was no reason to say "no" when it isn't a no.
o3o Does it even matter?


FmEkJ2.gif


#43 ameritt

ameritt

    Spiny

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • Fandom:
    Pokemon, Zelda, Fire Emblem

Posted 16 April 2013 - 03:40 PM


But, that's my point, he said no, and I asked for a source, and there isn't one. That's the source for him implying, not confirming, so there was no reason to say "no" when it isn't a no.
o3o Does it even matter?

But it is a no. They delayed 'the game' to make it multi-console

Then they add 30 levels to 'the game' with the extra time that they have to work on it.

I don't see where you could read between the lines that it's only for the Wii U. If IGN or any other interviewer were confused about that they would have asked and confirmed it.

 

And no, it doesn't really matter all that much, I just don't really see why there is this much confusion. I'm not trying to be that kid who starts an internet argument or anything



#44 CUD

CUD

    Super Saiyan Dingus

  • Members
  • 1,337 posts
  • NNID:CUDesu
  • Fandom:
    Gaben

Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:06 PM

Still going to wait for it to come to Vita. ;)


This statement is false. The previous statement is true.

RIP in peace Nintendo.

cCIImXL.png


#45 Half

Half

    Blooper

  • Members
  • 170 posts
  • NNID:HalfName
  • Fandom:
    Curse all fanboys/girls.

Posted 17 April 2013 - 03:40 AM

But it is a no. They delayed 'the game' to make it multi-console

Then they add 30 levels to 'the game' with the extra time that they have to work on it.

I don't see where you could read between the lines that it's only for the Wii U. If IGN or any other interviewer were confused about that they would have asked and confirmed it.

 

And no, it doesn't really matter all that much, I just don't really see why there is this much confusion. I'm not trying to be that kid who starts an internet argument or anything

They still never said that thouuuuuuggggghhhhhhhh. xD
I'm just being hopeful I suppose, and it's cool, you are actually probably right, but the world wouldn't be much fun if there weren't opposites.


FmEkJ2.gif


#46 ameritt

ameritt

    Spiny

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • Fandom:
    Pokemon, Zelda, Fire Emblem

Posted 17 April 2013 - 12:26 PM

They still never said that thouuuuuuggggghhhhhhhh. xD
I'm just being hopeful I suppose, and it's cool, you are actually probably right, but the world wouldn't be much fun if there weren't opposites.

Haha if you were right, I think I would cry of happiness, but unfortunately, I just don't see that happening






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Anti-Spam Bots!