thanks for the advice and sorry for my mistakes but to counter your point although review scores can be misleading because there are a lot of great games with terrible scores and a lot of crap games with great scores review scores, but review scores do matter and the titles you listed most of them were flops with bellow 70 on metacritic such as disaster day of crisis having a 69 and wii music with a 63 for example although you did mention some great games there are just more new IP's on ps3 this generation that were grade A games
thanks for the advice and sorry for my mistakes but to counter your point although review scores can be misleading because there are a lot of great games with terrible scores and a lot of crap games with great scores review scores, but review scores do matter and the titles you listed most of them were flops with bellow 70 on metacritic such as disaster day of crisis having a 69 and wii music with a 63 for example although you did mention some great games there are just more new IP's on ps3 this generation that were grade A games
Eh, this isnt really a counter argument, this is a type of logical fallacy called 'moving the goalposts'.
You started with one argument, then changed it to another when you found out your argument was wrong.
Reviews jave become nothing but industry propaganda, and are actually sold as a service.
mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/business/book-reviewers-for-hire-meet-a-demand-for-online-raves.html?rct=j&q=selling%20reviews&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCwQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2012%2F08%2F26%2Fbusiness%2Fbook-reviewers-for-hire-meet-a-demand-for-online-raves.html%3Fpagewanted%3Dall&ei=hv3nUd5-hriKAr76gWg&usg=AFQjCNHr820r40-zkWjqnK9D8ZtM9zjOew&bvm=bv.49478099,d.cGE&pagewanted=all&
If you think this doesnt happen with games, you are very naive.
Your dismissal of games as 'not counting' because you dont deem them as 'A quality games' is also very foolish. Who decides what game is of what quality for someone? Not you.
Several entries on my list alone sold more than all of your sce 'new' ip's combined.
And, as far as subjective matters go
Sony's new ip's are almost all garbage and filth of the worst kind compared to what sony used to make before the ps3.
Amazing ip's like Alundra, dark cloud, colony wars, ico, legend of dragoon, and similar sce style games were scrapped because games of such large nonlinear sophisticated design were too expensive to make, and didnt appeal to the drooling must kill something every 15 seconds or get bored and confused masses.
So, identical linear popcorn rollercoaster ride style games like uncharted were pumped out and shoved down 'gamers' throats, NOT the original gamers who have been around since gamings inception mind you, no, the slack jawed drooling yokels we started gaming as a hobby to get away from were the new prize, as theyd buy the same garbage over and over and over again as long as enough reviews told them it was cool too.
Naughty dog finally made something special again with the last of us. But before the ps3, everything sce did was special and unique.
Even Mark Cerny realizes this and knows the ps3 era is an era of homogenized guilded terds compared to sce's former glory.
You should seriously stop attempting to praise sony via taking a crap on nintendo.
Your arguments are logically wrong, and argumentively not done well enough enough to get away with it.
You should simply show how much Mark Cerny and Sony are doing to show us they want the ps4 to be more than a homogenous thoughtless big budget no substance box like the ps3 was.
Sony is doing a good job. Mark Cerny is doing a fantastic job, they single handedly changed my mind from getting an xbone only because i thought the sce i knew and loved was mostly dead and worthless, back to ps4 only (because im simply not getting two machines that have 99% of the same library again), and this was BEFORE xbone drm'd in every bodies cheerios.
But attempting to use nintendo as a crutch to prop up sony? Not working for you.
