HIT POINTS
Edited by Cerberuz, 29 April 2012 - 09:20 PM.
Posted 27 April 2012 - 02:10 PM
Edited by Superman, 27 April 2012 - 02:11 PM.
Posted 27 April 2012 - 02:51 PM
Stop raging. So a game cannot have a similar engine anymore?The looks, sounds, and gameplay seem EXACTLY like Super Smash Bros.
WTF
Posted 27 April 2012 - 03:39 PM
Posted 27 April 2012 - 03:50 PM
Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:05 PM
Posted 27 April 2012 - 04:15 PM
Posted 28 April 2012 - 09:33 AM
WTF?Stop raging. So a game cannot have a similar engine anymore?
I would get crap for saying Modern Warfare and Battlefield are the same, when they are.
Edited by nintendo3DS, 28 April 2012 - 09:33 AM.
Posted 28 April 2012 - 09:49 AM
They're exactly the same, don't deny it.WTF?
Modern Warfare and Battlefield are not the same.
Their gameplay and everything is entirely different from each other.
Don't even speak up if you don't know what you're talking about.
Posted 28 April 2012 - 05:17 PM
Edited by Chinomanila, 28 April 2012 - 05:19 PM.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:45 AM
I am not denying it.They're exactly the same, don't deny it.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:07 AM
And the same could be said of the upcoming Sony game. I can point out your hypocrisy with the modern warfare and battlefield games, both games which are war FPS games where they look exactly the same and play the same from an observer. I'll call them clones of each other and third party knock offs of Halo while you call the Sony game a rip off of SSB.I am not denying it.
They both play entirely different. If you actually played them, you would know.
I think all JRPGs are the same. But they aren't, right?
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:15 AM
My reaction to your post.And the same could be said of the upcoming Sony game. I can point out your hypocrisy with the modern warfare and battlefield games, both games which are war FPS games where they look exactly the same and play the same from an observer. I'll call them clones of each other and third party knock offs of Halo while you call the Sony game a rip off of SSB.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:50 AM
Care to prove your own logic, then?My reaction to your post.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:17 PM
I am not denying it.
They both play entirely different. If you actually played them, you would know.
I think all JRPGs are the same. But they aren't, right?
Edited by Elric, 29 April 2012 - 12:25 PM.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:28 PM
although i dont play shooting games. shooting games are based in the real world (sort of), and are based on 1 single idea. you can't change the way it play's, for example, if 2 racing sim's have the same cars and tracks, or feel to driving a car. you wouldn't say it was copying. their both trying to be as realistic as possible, and the only way of doing that is if they base they game on reality. in shooting games, its a similar story, there both trying to make it seem as realistic, natural, and comfortable to play. you can't change a shooter so it feels different to other shooter's, because then it won't feel right.Care to prove your own logic, then?
You're calling the new Sony game a rip off of SSB because the graphics seem similar, it plays similar, and it has a similar engine.
I can to the same with Modern Warfare and Battlefield by calling them clones. They look the same, run off the same FPS engine, and play very similar.
Neither of us have played the game, so you passed your judgement on sony without keeping an open mind while I passed my judgement of the FPSs because they follow the same formula (run around aimlessly while spraying bullets everywhere in a warzone).
Edited by stephen, 29 April 2012 - 12:30 PM.
PM me if you want to add me on 3ds
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:49 PM
This "original idea" isn't really all that original. SSB was based off of fighting games, but with a 3D arena. It isn't the first, nor the last. I can list off several games with that same idea: Dead or alive, mortal kombat, any digimon fighting games, the jump fighting games, and the power stone series.in ssb there is no limitation to the game, developers can add anything to the game, because the game is not based on anything. its an idea which can grow into new area's, and new gameplay. sony could have done anything with the game, different weapons, more complex arena's, 3d arena's, different combat styles etc..... they obviously didn't, and they blatantly copied a original idea which could have been expanded. they didn't even expand the game into new areas.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 12:51 PM
Posted 29 April 2012 - 01:16 PM
your right on some games are similer, and it wasn't the first, but there still different. the combat is different, the feel is different, the graphics are different. each one of these games are unique in there own way, and they add something to that genre, whether it be online, graphics, characters etc... what new thing has sony come up with.This "original idea" isn't really all that original. SSB was based off of fighting games, but with a 3D arena. It isn't the first, nor the last. I can list off several games with that same idea: Dead or alive, mortal kombat, any digimon fighting games, the jump fighting games, and the power stone series.
Sony could have just gone their regular route of a 2d esque fighting game, but they made it more free and 3d. Besides, the game isn't even out yet and it can still prove to be far different than what people expect.
And on a note of the FPS games. They are the same bland thing because they aren't trying new ideas. Halo is perfect example of how an FPS should be, constantly getting better and trying out new things. TF2 is another example, it is a great game and the majority of FPS fans don't like it because they can't cheat the game unless they hack (they can't shoot through windows, do effortless headshots, have regening armour, etc...).
PM me if you want to add me on 3ds
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users