#1
Posted 28 May 2012 - 12:29 AM
It would be really smart of them to show a first party game using UE4. Or have a third party game by a dev that is experienced in HD gaming and graphics show off a tweaked Wii U version of a game, so people can see the difference between consoles.
(I tried to post this in E3 2012 but I had to enter a prefix? posting from my phone..)
#3
Posted 28 May 2012 - 12:50 AM
But don't want to expect to much and b left disapointed
#4
Posted 28 May 2012 - 01:04 AM
#5
Posted 28 May 2012 - 02:19 AM
#6
Posted 28 May 2012 - 02:22 AM
#7
Posted 28 May 2012 - 03:47 AM
#8
Posted 28 May 2012 - 05:47 AM
Crysis isn't that spectacular anymore where as when it was released.Yeah that's true (I really hope the 3DS will show some power soon..), but if they made a new Metroid or something with BETTER GRAPHICS THAN CRYSIS I will be amazed.
Some people have said the Zelda demo was appeently sub 720, that was with early dev equipment.
im not fussed about the games being actual HD, if they can squeeze more performance and then have it upscaled then its fine by me.
#9
Posted 28 May 2012 - 06:01 AM
Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
#10
Posted 28 May 2012 - 06:25 AM
Crysis isn't that spectacular anymore where as when it was released.
Some people have said the Zelda demo was appeently sub 720, that was with early dev equipment.
im not fussed about the games being actual HD, if they can squeeze more performance and then have it upscaled then its fine by me.
It wouldn't make sense to show a HD experience that isn't HD.. And true about Crysis, but can you name better looking console games?
It will debut the same way the 360 and PS3 debuted. Ports will look the same as last gen, fanboys will accuse of being on-par because devs won't be used to the new tech yet. Nintendo's first party games will have glorious graphics. At launch, look to PIkmin 3 and maybe killer freaks (built form the ground up for Wii U) for next gen graphics.
Very true most likely. First party games from Nintendo always look good, take a look at SMG. When playing it, I don't feel like the Wii needs more power.
#11
Posted 28 May 2012 - 07:18 AM
#12
Posted 28 May 2012 - 07:21 AM
Most console games that aren't 720P often around 600P - 700P. Call of Duty runs at 600P, BF3 ran at 1280 X 704. There's handful of other games that don't run at 720P. Personally on a console I really don't notice this, though when I am playing on PC I do like it be full resolution. Most normal non PC gamers wouldn't even notice the difference.It wouldn't make sense to show a HD experience that isn't HD.. And true about Crysis, but can you name better looking console games?
What I was trying to say is that despite people saying that they want Wii U games to actually run at 1080p, I'd rather have them at sub HD (which is barely noticeable if you're sitting far away or use a 23" screen/monitor) and maximise frame rate/ graphics. I would rather have a Sub HD game and allow them to utlise more resources or to have a very stable and playable frame rate.
#13
Posted 28 May 2012 - 07:34 AM
And the answer is yes, they should show the best looking games at E3..
#14
Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:21 AM
#15
Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:21 AM
#16
Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:38 AM
Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
#17
Posted 28 May 2012 - 10:04 AM
Молоту войн и рокоту гроз вольные рати верны, где ветром могучим из братины звёзд рунные стяги пьяны.
#20
Posted 29 May 2012 - 09:32 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Wii U Hardware
Gaming →
Wii U Hardware →
WiiTalkUListen: What hardware questions do U have?Started by WiiTalkUListen, 03 Oct 2012 wiitalkulisten, wii u, wiiu and 3 more... |
|
|||
Gaming →
Wii U Hardware →
Wii U Online Gameplay and Hardware ProblemsStarted by zerocritz, 23 Jul 2012 Wii u, Wii u online and 8 more... |
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users