Okay yes context is important, everyone agrees with that. I thought it was apparent I wasn't commenting on the shortsightedness aspect of the problem and apparently it wasn't.
I thought it was pretty obvious when i gave the same answer every time saying ' yes, you already explained that' that you would stop repeating this over and over. I dont care if you arent talking about the short sightednes part, I was, and you joined my conversation. Your failure to take that into consideration is not going to retroactively make me change topics no matter how many times you repeat it.
I took context into consideration when I apologized by mentioning any vagueness on my part. I admitted I should have given more context to my statement. I don't think we can say much more on this without it turning into a circle?
I agree, and dont know why you keep bringing it up when i reapeatedly say youve already explained this.
"(honestly the screenshot you showed to be "colorful" was basically duochromatic and also has variance issues)'"
I don't see me being ostentatious unless you believe my vocabulary to be over the top?
You are doing it again, becoming increasingly pedantic. I copy pasted a definition, and you ignored the first two words so you can focus narrowly on a petty off topic argument on the third word.
I believe my comment is innocuous within the context of my post. "whether or not it looks like Nintendo Land". But I suppose it does come off as unneeded and by extension must have some ill intent?
It doesnt work like that, you cant simply make up a context to suddenly suit your argument.
I dunno. Guess it doesn't matter much, it shouldn't be offensive. If it did to you then I apologize. I didn't mention it to help ignore a point if that's what you're getting it.
Except you did, and you admit it right here:
The only point I ignored is "it becomes more colorful" for reasons you mentioned I already stated. I didn't care if it became more colorful, I wasn't commenting on that.
You should have been, THAT WAS THE ENTIRE CONTEXT OF THE CONVERSATION YOU JOINED. Your post was pointless, because you never bothered to find out what you were responding too, and once you did, you ignored it to build a massive off topic argument.
You seem to have a problem with me not caring about the transformation.
I have a problem with you repeatedly trying to change the subject of MY POST YOU JUMPED IN ON. Despite me reapetedly explaining to you why it makes no sense for me to change subjects.
It's not shortsighted for me to make a neutral comment on the color scheme.
Its the very definition of shortsighted, nuetrality, positivity, and negativity hold no bearing. You can be shortsighted and be positive, and well informed and be negative.
But I'm sorry, I disagree. I can form neutral captain obvious comments on incomplete data. Nothing wrong with that.
Of course you can, but they are short sighted opinions. Nothing wrong with calling a spade a spade, either.
The problem is either negative or positive comments on incomplete data.
I'm fine with apologizing for being too vague but not about making neutral comments.
You werent vauge, you jumped into something you didnt understand, without bothering to understand it, and then once you did, you decided to ignore it in favor of a different argument.
"And then you jump in trying to 'explain' their side."
Does explain a lot. I had no way of knowing you were irritated enough to... develop a tone with me.
No, that only came after multiple posts of you making pedantic defensive arguments.
I was only making what I thought was a lighthearted, perhaps even helpful comment.
Context is important, it can change the meaning of words both after and preceding it.
Honestly I thought either you'd either go A: Oh I see it now! B: Sorry I don't see it, agree to disagree C: I see it but they shouldn't complain because XYZ (explaining why it's shortsighted). As I stated I see why it went wrong.
That would likely be because you didnt know the context behind my post.
"As for your problems with tone. You are projecting."
I disagree. In your edit with the examples you use condescending language in an attempt to make my statement look poor.
There is no such thing as condescending language. I used arguments to defeat your statement. You feeling that they then looked poor is your own personal expression.
Pretty much using noob language and exaggerations to suggest I'm naive, etc. Even if you were upset at me and believing negative things of me, that was still unneeded.
projection. You are personally applying all this to yourself, when this was simply what the PEOPLE IVE BEEN OBSERVING MANY OF, have been expressing, and what you jumped in on, but that has to do with context, you know, the whole context thing you keep dismissing to try and make everything about you?
Anyways. That should be everything. Last thing I wanted was to have a internet argument lol.
That is certainly not what your actions have shown.
If you actually dont mind, ive had a few pictures ive found demonstrating some rather unprecedented scale xenoblades demonstrating, that your arguments have been delaying me posting.
- Anomandaris likes this