YA HOMIE.
Posted 12 April 2013 - 07:43 PM
Isn't the Wii U version running at a higher FPS? I believe it's 60FPS, while the 360/PS3 versions runs at 30FPS.
I'm glad that this game has off-tv play. Most recent Wii U games don't have this, it seems like its going to be a feature that many developers will do away with in the future.
“Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of man, that state is obsolete.”— Rod Serling, “The Twilight Zone” The Obsolete Man
Smoke meth. Hail Satan. Watch the yearly Twilight Zone marathons. Talk to dead people. Everyone is gay. Ignore people. Live life to the fullest.
Lakitu
Posted 12 April 2013 - 07:50 PM
Isn't the Wii U version running at a higher FPS? I believe it's 60FPS, while the 360/PS3 versions runs at 30FPS.
I'm glad that this game has off-tv play. Most recent Wii U games don't have this, it seems like its going to be a feature that many developers will do away with in the future.
Would be nice if the developers stated that and gave us a reason to purchase Wii U over the others. it seems like its against the law for developers to say positive things about the Wii U now that the "ALL MIGHTY PERFECT GAMING PC PS4" has been revealed.
Edited by GAMER1984, 12 April 2013 - 07:51 PM.
Lakitu
Posted 13 April 2013 - 02:03 AM
So far the only games designed like that are Nintendoland and ZombiU. I would rather have a game that can be played on the screen only than a game that gets cumbersome due to switching back and forth. If a game does it well, good for it. I just think off tv play is a lot better.
Understandable. I personally would rather see more games that make the second screen an integral part of the experience.
That Guy
Posted 13 April 2013 - 02:45 AM
I'm not against innovative use of the ganepad either. It's just that very few companies actually use it in a meaningful way. I like seeing the gamepad used in ways that enhance games, like Mass Effect 3 and Darksiders 2, where you had weapons and powers mapped to touchscreen buttons.I disagree. I rather have games that make the most of the Gamepad and give us a far better experience then you would get on other consoles then ones that have been scaled back or simplified just because people want off TV play. Otherwise its just pointless having the Gamepad for a controller.
Same here.
I will not die until I achieve something. Even though the ordeal is high, I never give in. Therefore, I die with no regrets~Ikaruga Prologue
http://fc05.devianta...ask-d5k49sd.jpg
Spiny
Posted 14 April 2013 - 08:34 AM
I'm not against innovative use of the ganepad either. It's just that very few companies actually use it in a meaningful way. I like seeing the gamepad used in ways that enhance games, like Mass Effect 3 and Darksiders 2, where you had weapons and powers mapped to touchscreen buttons.
In short, I would rather have developers use the gamepad in small yet significant ways, because that is their comfort zone.
Yeah that's exactly what I like. I like the simple things that make it significantly easier
Chain Chomp
Posted 14 April 2013 - 08:45 PM
While I'm mostly cool with the Off-TV Play feature, I don't see much point using it for fighting games. Unless another Wii U GamePad was used, which I think would be a cool idea.
Of Nelson and Murdock. Avocados at law.
Attorney at day, vigilante by night.
NintendoChitChat
Posted 15 April 2013 - 02:25 AM
Isn't the Wii U version running at a higher FPS? I believe it's 60FPS, while the 360/PS3 versions runs at 30FPS.
I'm glad that this game has off-tv play. Most recent Wii U games don't have this, it seems like its going to be a feature that many developers will do away with in the future.
From Nintendo Direct, as posted by others in another thread. Wii U version is 60 fps & DLC. http://youtu.be/cntz1GyM1Bs?t=35m11s
Edited by Sorceror12, 15 April 2013 - 02:26 AM.
-- 
-- 
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
