Jump to content


Photo

New Batman Arkham game planned for 2013


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Zinix

Zinix

    YA HOMIE.

  • Members
  • 4,410 posts
  • NNID:zinixzero
  • Fandom:
    The Twilight Zone Fandom

Posted 12 February 2013 - 07:56 AM

The full transcript of the investor call can be found via Yahoo! Finance.

During the call, Time Warner’s CFO and chief administrative officer John K. Martin stated, “And we also have a strong games release this year, which will include the next release in the Batman Arkham franchise. So all in all, we expect Warners to post another very strong year in 2013. And with a little luck, the year should be as good or maybe even a little bit better than 2012.”

VG247 own sources confirm that Rocksteady Studios is not developing this particular game. This could nod to the rumoured ‘Silver Age’ Batman prequel that was touted last year.

This could mean a new game in the ‘Batman: Arkham’ franchise is due before the end of the year, or as part of the next financial year. We’ve contacted Warner Bros. to confirm.

http://www.vg247.com/2013/02/12/new-batman-arkham-due-in-2013-warner-financials-suggest-rumour/


No Rocksteady= no buy.


“Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of man, that state is obsolete.”— Rod Serling, “The Twilight Zone” The Obsolete Man

Smoke meth. Hail Satan. Watch the yearly Twilight Zone marathons. Talk to dead people. Everyone is gay. Ignore people. Live life to the fullest.


#2 Foot

Foot

    The most badass sociopath to ever exist.

  • Members
  • 1,038 posts
  • NNID:DPapcinEVO
  • Fandom:
    Sock Wars, Shoehorn Leghorn

Posted 12 February 2013 - 08:12 AM

I'd have to see more before making a judgement, I was actually looking forward to the Slver Age prequel!
I am the foot. I do not like you. You smother me with socks and shoes, then step on me thousands of times a day.

We foot will rebel one day.

#3 umegames

umegames

    Chain Chomp

  • Members
  • 651 posts
  • NNID:Donte2k
  • Fandom:
    Sonic and Megaman

Posted 12 February 2013 - 11:00 AM

I'd have to see more before making a judgement, I was actually looking forward to the Slver Age prequel!

Right.
Id also hope too, that rocksteady is developing it

#4 SoldMyWiiUAndLeftTheForums

SoldMyWiiUAndLeftTheForums

    Pokémon Trainer

  • Members
  • 4,168 posts

Posted 13 February 2013 - 05:27 PM

Even without Rocksteady it might still be good, you never know, I'm reserving my judgment.

#5 Auzzie Wingman

Auzzie Wingman

    Mournblade

  • Members
  • 4,346 posts
  • NNID:AuzzieWingman
  • Fandom:
    Not enough space here

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:57 PM

I think it was already rumoured that Rocksteady's next assignment was TMNT, so im not surprised. It hasn't been confirmed who's doing it either, so I can't pass judgement on whether it's good or not.

Trophy Cards are classy too! LOLZIGZAGOON

 

AuzzieWingman.png


#6 DanJiblets

DanJiblets

    Bullet Bill

  • Members
  • 357 posts
  • Fandom:
    Nintendo, Halo

Posted 15 February 2013 - 09:26 PM

Want TMNT! Love the Arkham games, but I'll pass on another. I've had enough Batman.

#7 Mitch

Mitch

    Dingus

  • Members
  • 1,839 posts
  • NNID:Mitch13pavel
  • Fandom:
    Mitch :3

Posted 15 February 2013 - 09:44 PM

Want TMNT! Love the Arkham games, but I'll pass on another. I've had enough Batman.



o_o there is no such thing as to much batman!!!!

#8 Bonac

Bonac

    Red Koopa Troopa

  • Members
  • 55 posts
  • Fandom:
    Zelda, Mario,Megaman, Metal Gear Solid

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:43 PM

The arkham games are some of the best games ever in my opinion so there's never enough of the bat

#9 Socalmuscle

Socalmuscle

    Hammer Bro.

  • Members
  • 1,677 posts

Posted 16 February 2013 - 11:43 PM

The arkham games are some of the best games regardless of franchise.

Addictively fun and follow proper formulas.

Add to that some seriously outstanding graphics, voice acting, storyline, motivating factors, and actual gameplay mechanics, and it's something you'd have to turn common sense off in order to Hate.

If only all big franchises could be treated like this.

Superman is prob the most notorious example of a great game waiting to be made, only to be give the crappiest treatments ever.

#10 Hunter

Hunter

    Cheetah

  • Members
  • 1,664 posts
  • NNID:Mr.Orange
  • Fandom:
    spyro, crash bandicoot, prince of persia

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:01 AM

Superman is prob the most notorious example of a great game waiting to be made, only to be give the crappiest treatments ever.


I think the main problem with making a game about Superman is the fact that he's pretty much invincible.

#11 PedanticGamer

PedanticGamer

    Bullet Bill

  • Members
  • 370 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:27 AM

I think the main problem with making a game about Superman is the fact that he's pretty much invincible.


Indeed what are you going to do give every bad guy a piece of kyrpotnite or similar.

#12 CUD

CUD

    Super Saiyan Dingus

  • Members
  • 1,337 posts
  • NNID:CUDesu
  • Fandom:
    Gaben

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:33 AM

Indeed what are you going to do give every bad guy a piece of kyrpotnite or similar.

Or just make him fly through a bunch of rings. ;)

This statement is false. The previous statement is true.

RIP in peace Nintendo.

cCIImXL.png


#13 PedanticGamer

PedanticGamer

    Bullet Bill

  • Members
  • 370 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 02:57 AM

Or just make him fly through a bunch of rings. ;)


In any case I don't know what all the fuss is about, we already have the perfect Superman game with Superman 64.

#14 Auzzie Wingman

Auzzie Wingman

    Mournblade

  • Members
  • 4,346 posts
  • NNID:AuzzieWingman
  • Fandom:
    Not enough space here

Posted 17 February 2013 - 03:37 AM

You could just do a Samus Aran and make him not-so-Superman at the beginning of the game.

If you wanted to.

Trophy Cards are classy too! LOLZIGZAGOON

 

AuzzieWingman.png


#15 CUD

CUD

    Super Saiyan Dingus

  • Members
  • 1,337 posts
  • NNID:CUDesu
  • Fandom:
    Gaben

Posted 17 February 2013 - 03:43 AM

In any case I don't know what all the fuss is about, we already have the perfect Superman game with Superman 64.

Considering how powerful Superman is Superman 64 doesn't seem so bad. It doesn't seem like they could do much more with the character really unless, as previously mentioned, all the enemies had Kryptonite combat doesn't really seem like it could work.

You could just do a Samus Aran and make him not-so-Superman at the beginning of the game.

If you wanted to.

No.

This statement is false. The previous statement is true.

RIP in peace Nintendo.

cCIImXL.png


#16 PedanticGamer

PedanticGamer

    Bullet Bill

  • Members
  • 370 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 04:06 AM

You could just do a Samus Aran and make him not-so-Superman at the beginning of the game.

If you wanted to.


..... and while we are at it why don't we give James Bond the power of flight and make Hobbits the size of giants.... you know, just because.

#17 Socalmuscle

Socalmuscle

    Hammer Bro.

  • Members
  • 1,677 posts

Posted 17 February 2013 - 11:59 PM

I think the main problem with making a game about Superman is the fact that he's pretty much invincible.


That's not a problem when you put him in the right setting with the right circumstances and enemies.

The problem with superman traditionally isn't superman himself or his powers. It is the blatant stupidity if putting this epic superhero of galactic proportions against some bald guy. Seriously. Stupid.

I can see how it could work occasionally. But superman is meant to done in an epic scale. Like lord of the rings epic. Guys like darkseid ate what superman is made for. Epic proportions. Not a bash Arkhaasylumm game with superman in it.
Rather a game that skirts the two. One that presents investigative and secretive challenges for the Clark kent side of things that lead to epic, grand scale shock and awe that are "a job for superman."
Thats why no one has problems with green lantern (other than the lane 360 game or Ryan Reynolds movie. He has huge powers. But he's given this epic scale to use them in.

Superman isn't the problem. It's the ridiculousness of tiring him to metropolis all the time and retreading the same rather lame "bad guy."

Give him a metropolis "home base," people to love that keeps him vulnerable, and a grand scale of epic propel rations that actually explore and challenge the king of superheroes to the limit.

If ever there was a game waiting to be made that would be fun exploring the possibilities. This would be it. But it's going to take imagination, formula, story, and creativity. But by people who also just simply know how to make a good game.

Even Arkhaasylumm city itself could lend itself to a superman, though it would be a stretch. The scanner in place of X-ray, the bat cable in place of flight, the various time challenges, etc. instead of phones, super-hearing, etc.

It's just that. I Ine ever gives superman the thoughtfulness required.

Hers hoping the new movie reinvigorates interest in the king of super Heros.

Edited by Socalmuscle, 18 February 2013 - 12:02 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

Anti-Spam Bots!