I'm getting some confusion over who started the movement in the first place. Feminists or anti-feminists. The huffingtonpost seems to think it was Feminists that started it but I think they might be confused a bit. I don't know though.
http://www.huffingto...kushpmg00000067
"Feminism should be about fighting for equality, talking about the big issues like the gender pay gap, FGM, domestic violence and forced marriage."
I agree with that but at this point it's a bit late. I'm also not convinced those are the only issues they're focusing on even when they say so.
Same here. If it was started by 'anti feminists' I cant find anything under the deluge of responses to it.
But doesnt it seem counter intuitive to respond to something that dumb in the first place? By responding to a baseless claim about value via appearence, arent they themselves supplying valur to the concept of the importance of appearence over actual worth?