It's funny how every time someone disagrees with they way you present your arguments, they're automatically supporters of GamerGate. I don't know anything about GamerGate, and, really, if I had to side with anyone in this thread, I'd side with the anti-GamerGate side. But that doesn't mean I'm gonna accept your deplorable disregard for the rules of the website.
1.- Aha, but in fact you have directly insulted and called people stupid. Just because they're accompanied by a real argument it doesn't mean they're not there. Or do you want me to quote the many, many times you've called Wydra a "brainwashed tool" and "ignorant prick"?
Also, how you seem think that having an argument that doesn't devolve into spiels made entirely from inflammatory language is treating it with kid gloves, is beyond me.
2.- Warning or no warning, censored or not censored, you're still posting a link that deals with and links to fetishistic content, a link you DIDN'T need to post because you're not going to find anyone contesting the legitimacy of a relatively easy to find meme. Look at the rule. It very clearly says "No posting" not "No posting without a warning" or "No posting unless you're 3Dude". Hold yourself accountable, will you?
3.- I'm not here to add anything to the ongoing debate, that's why I didn't address anything brought up. I'm not trying to discredit your argument, as you seem to think, I'm here to point out a big issue with the moderation of this website, that, sadly, is present in full force within this thread.
I'm not sure if that's addressed towards me, but just in case, I wasn't aware that GamerGate's mascot (didn't even know they had a logo or that Vivian James was their mascot previous to reading this terrible thread) was a rape meme. I was deeply disappointed when I read of it here, since I actually liked the concept of Vivian James and what TFYC's were doing with her. It's really too bad it ended up being typical 4chan crap.
I'm with everyone else on the sentiment that this thread should be locked.
1. Yeah, thats not nearly as much as you are trying to make it out to be, the first, a response at wydras ACTIONS, of contiunally, purposefully, repeating the same falsified information continually, a tactic called Argument by repitition and an activity participators are told to engage in the paste bin portions of every GG thread.
http://www.logically...t-by-repetition
And the second, which is a response to his dehumanizing and disregaurding actual people being driven from their homes, at the hands of gamified harrassment he explicitely condoned. Which is an entirely apt description of his actions and behavior.
Yeah, no kid gloves, Im not going to foster an environment where that behavior is acceptable. Its already driven off many members of this board because it became a hostile place to be openly homosexual in the past. I have a ZERO tolerance policy for that kind of behavior. Being criticised of what you do is ENTIRELY different from what or who you are and have no choice in being. So yeah, Boo hoo, Im mean towards people who exhibit bad behavior. Maybe you would feel better if I looked him up online, hacked into websites and retreived information like what his real name is, where he specifically lives, who his parents are, and started sending death threats to his house forcing him to move? Yeah, thats totally more acceptable than being called out on your behavior and being told it like it is.
2. It was openly known that this would not be a censored discussion of gamergate, as such a discussion can simply not be had because of the full spectrum of the subject matter involved. That doesnt mean we are going to post images to full on nudity, but a link to text describing a thing thats pertinant to whats going on, yeah. Gamergate is full of ugly rainbow. Sorry. Also, I didnt realize that original article I linked to had a video to the actual glitch in action with uncensored nudity. When it was brought to my attention I changed it to an article without the video.
3. Thats fine you feel that way.
If you want this thread locked, anyone, who wants this thread locked, ask mourne, hes the one who decided to open the subject, its his to call closed. Thats a straight shot by the way, no hidden meanings. I think it should be locked as well.
Pertinent: https://medium.com/@...te-62c151c0eebb