No they dont. They dont even come close.
in your oppinion maybe but in mine they do
Posted 12 June 2013 - 02:14 PM
No they dont. They dont even come close.
in your oppinion maybe but in mine they do
Posted 12 June 2013 - 04:45 PM
in your oppinion maybe but in mine they do
Edited by 3Dude, 12 June 2013 - 04:48 PM.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 07:06 AM
Your 'opinion', is factually, observably, prove-ably, hilariously, wrong, and yes, opinions can indeed be wrong.
And I suspect you know it too, or you would have posted screens of said games.
Bayonetta 2 and X would like to have a word with you.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 07:11 AM
Bayonetta 2 and X would like to have a word with you.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 08:19 AM
Bayonetta 2 and X would like to have a word with you.
Alex, 3dude is actually defending the Wii U by showing that X and Bayonetta 2 look amazing and can actually compare to PS4/Xbox 1 games graphically. The guy's comment (which you liked) is saying the Wii U is entirely weak and that there are PS3 games that blow every Wii U game out of the water.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 08:25 AM
i now see the wii u as a last gen console with more ram and slightly sharper graphics,some of the new ps3 games that are coming out blow what i have seen for the wii u out the water x was there most impressive game imo but compare that to the ps4/xbox 1 games and it falls way short
What PS3 game comes close to looking as good as Bayonetta 2, X, Mario Kart, or even Wind Waker?
Edited by Rod Serling, 13 June 2013 - 08:25 AM.
“Any state, any entity, any ideology that fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of man, that state is obsolete.”— Rod Serling, “The Twilight Zone” The Obsolete Man
Smoke meth. Hail Satan. Watch the yearly Twilight Zone marathons. Talk to dead people. Everyone is gay. Ignore people. Live life to the fullest.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 09:07 AM
What PS3 game comes close to looking as good as Bayonetta 2, X, Mario Kart, or even Wind Waker?
Edited by Goodtwin, 13 June 2013 - 09:48 AM.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 09:20 AM
Posted 13 June 2013 - 09:25 AM
Im actually pretty confused with ww hd. I notice a looooooooooot of original cube assets including the horrible (even back on cube) flat treeline on top of outset island.
wtf?
It seems they just redid some npc models, lighting, probably switched to ww's original uncompressed textures and called it a day.
I dig that they load the entirety of the great ocean at once enabling hyper speed travel, and only use the islands high lod's though, but still, I expected a bit more.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 09:47 AM
I agree with you guys, I thought they were going to entirely redo the games graphics, but thats simply not the case. Lighting and shadows are both a lot better, and its 1080p, also hearing that it may be 60fps, but other than that not much was done. This is a game that should cost $40, but Nintendo will most likely charge $60 and I am such a sucker that I will pay it.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 09:54 AM
I agree with you guys, I thought they were going to entirely redo the games graphics, but thats simply not the case. Lighting and shadows are both a lot better, and its 1080p, also hearing that it may be 60fps, but other than that not much was done. This is a game that should cost $40, but Nintendo will most likely charge $60 and I am such a sucker that I will pay it.
Maybe they felt things were fine and polished enough and are spending more resources/time on Zelda U . I too will pay full price for WW
Posted 13 June 2013 - 11:02 AM
Posted 13 June 2013 - 01:46 PM
Re-read situation, load previous save file, and try that quest again.
I misread. Sorry 3Dude.
Alex, 3dude is actually defending the Wii U by showing that X and Bayonetta 2 look amazing and can actually compare to PS4/Xbox 1 games graphically. The guy's comment (which you liked) is saying the Wii U is entirely weak and that there are PS3 games that blow every Wii U game out of the water.
I just took my like away from that guy and gave it to 3Dude.
Posted 13 June 2013 - 02:29 PM
I don't really care what people call out. Anyone who actually thinks Wii-U isn't a part of the 8th generation is just trolling and should be ignored.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 12:26 AM
People needing a reality check on wii u performance should really look elsewhere. Comments from 3dude and other posters are not fair or impartial and really you need to visit other sites like neogaf or digital foundry at eurogamer to get some real perspective on how wii u games are performing or technical analysis.
You read these threads and clearly when you get comments like 'dominating victory' you are dealing with someone of a childlike mentality who clearly isn't impartial.
There is little point wasting time arguing with such people in these threads when there is an avalanche of evidence elsewhere on more impartial sites.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 12:50 AM
People needing a reality check on wii u performance should really look elsewhere. Comments from 3dude and other posters are not fair or impartial and really you need to visit other sites like neogaf or digital foundry at eurogamer to get some real perspective on how wii u games are performing or technical analysis.
So you're telling us to go look for impartial analysis... on neogaf?
Never change, DP, never change.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 02:23 AM
There is little point wasting time arguing with such people in these threads
Interestingly enough, you seem to do the very thing you're telling everyone else not to very well. I'm surprised you haven't cracked, caved in and bailed. Quite the resilient person you are.
Trophy Cards are classy too! LOLZIGZAGOON
Posted 14 June 2013 - 03:42 AM
People needing a reality check on wii u performance should really look elsewhere. Comments from 3dude and other posters are not fair or impartial and really you need to visit other sites like neogaf or digital foundry at eurogamer to get some real perspective on how wii u games are performing or technical analysis.
You read these threads and clearly when you get comments like 'dominating victory' you are dealing with someone of a childlike mentality who clearly isn't impartial.
There is little point wasting time arguing with such people in these threads when there is an avalanche of evidence elsewhere on more impartial sites.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 05:51 AM
People needing a reality check on wii u performance should really look elsewhere. Comments from 3dude and other posters are not fair or impartial and really you need to visit other sites like neogaf or digital foundry at eurogamer to get some real perspective on how wii u games are performing or technical analysis.
You read these threads and clearly when you get comments like 'dominating victory' you are dealing with someone of a childlike mentality who clearly isn't impartial.
There is little point wasting time arguing with such people in these threads when there is an avalanche of evidence elsewhere on more impartial sites.
Posted 14 June 2013 - 12:52 PM
I'm sorry but according to those sites games like Bayo2 and X aren't even possible on Wii U. I know 3dude is pro Wii U tech but the evidence is the games. I'm fine with what the Wii U is capable of. Stop trying to down the console no it oisnt on the same level as PS4 but from what we just seen at E3 its "CLEAR" its ona level ps360 isn't. That's what most people wanted and that's what they are soon to be getting.
its only just ahead of ps/360 ps4 and xbox1 are leaps ahead
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users