Posted by
on 18 March 2014 - 07:29 PM
yeah I know but there are still people on this site that think the opposite. but what ever.
Their loss. Especially those who constantly sell and re-buy the Wii u so often that the loss on resale is more than if they had kept their original Wii u and considered it a sunk cost.
Not pointing fingers though...
Posted by
on 02 January 2014 - 01:14 PM
What confuses me to this day is the quality of 360/PS3 ports. If, at launch, those games were running on one core (or was in 2?), in a rushed and non-optimized environment, and now we are seeing the same type of issues?
This is a confusing way of expressing it, but I would presume the developers now have all resources open to them, more than twice the ram, 3x the edram, a modern gpu with more power, but the games are not showing this versus their counterparts.
I realize this is not as simple as moving a game from your Steam library to a PC with different specs. However, is it really this difficult to put out a better product when it is compared side to side with a weaker system's version? It does not make sense, sending an inferior product out to die like this (no advertising, worst port), when they could promote their other versions or put the funds toward making products that will sell.
IIRC there's a critical component on the Wii U that's asynchronous while crappy ports are synchronous, causing a bottleneck.
Posted by
on 08 July 2013 - 07:34 PM
Posted by
on 23 June 2013 - 12:18 PM
Posted by
on 21 June 2013 - 04:19 AM
Find content
Not Telling
Posted by 
