Blasty

I'm getting a bedroom TV just to play the Wii U.

There are so many complaint threads all over the net it's not even funny. Seriously, I think we can all admit that it was a decent conference; we all just over-hyped it, a lot. Releasing it next year could turn out to be a horrible move. I think it'll still sell regardless of what we think of it at the moment.

http://static.fjcdn.com/comments/3498253+_7f6337855dd8e125e61a0d4e135a198d.png

The post isn't about if Sony will make a powerful machine, but if these specs are real then compared to the Wii U rumored specs, which are better? How does the 68xx compare to the 7670? I don't think we can compare the processors, but I do think the IBM will be more powerful.

I think the PS4 will be weaker than the Wii U or just a tiny bit stronger.

Please be just Pikmin Universe. I don't like when games have "HD" in the title.

Lets be honest here, swearing too much makes you look foolish.

Nintendo should leak false information.

A Pokemon MMO.

Heal: Link
Hurt: Captain Falcon

Apparently hurting Link is the cool thing to now.

This is why I don't think Nintendo should make a phone.

What OS would they use? WP7? For obvious reasons no. If they decided to go the Android route they'd end up paying Microsoft for every handset sold and they'd also risk a few lawsuits. Even if they do go the Android route they'd get lost in the sea of Android devices. Unless in some alternate world smartphones end up becoming the future of gaming why should Nintendo spend the cash to make their own Operating system? Also, I'd expect a handheld-smartphone hybrid to be packed with some of the best specs available with a nice sized battery. This device could very well end up being more powerful then their dedicated handheld and eat away at its sales. A phone like that wouldn't be cheap. It could end up at $200+ on a two year contract. I'm not even gonna get into the $1000+ you'd spend over the life of a contract. It wouldn't be a very good option for those of us who are younger.

The most important part is the games. If I were to spend a large sum of cash on a Nintendo phone I'd want to play quality Nintendo IPs on it. Trust me, you aren't going to get people who have no interest in gaming to pay $40+ for quality games. If only us "gaming enthusiasts" would be buying this phone and games for it they might as well just stay in the handheld market.

Another point is battery life. People would be using their phones for other tasks other than gaming. What if you were to find yourself in an emergency and your phone is dead from playing games on it? That would suck.

The market isn't ready for a true gaming phone.

A next gen console won't give you never before seen graphics, a PC will.

Quite the introduction. Anyway, welcome to the forums.

Nollog and Joshua have it completely right. People are afraid of change. They'd complain about everything.

If it's not going to be Wii U then I say drop the Wii part.

I know, I'm a dirty kid. America.

What have I told you about watching that stuff?!